NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques.

Author(s): Turashvili G, Yang W, McKinney S, Kalloger S, Gale N, Ng Y, Chow K, Bell L, Lorette J, Carrier M, Luk M, Aparicio S, Huntsman D, Yip S

Publication: Exp Mol Pathol, 2012, Vol. 92, Page 33-43

PubMed ID: 21963600 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of preservation method, fixation duration, long-term storage of paraffin blocks, and nucleic acid extraction method on the integrity and amplifiability of DNA and RNA and on morphological preservation.

Conclusion of Paper

Fixation with Sakura molecular fixative resulted in moderate to severe red blood cell swelling and superimposed eosinophilia which were not present in formalin-fixed tissue. While DNA and RNA extraction success rates were high using a variety of kits, DNA yields were highest with the WaxFree DNA kit but the resultant DNA was of the lowest quality. Similarly, RNA yields were the highest with the WaxFree RNA kit and the in-house TRIzol methods but the resultant RNA was of the lowest quality. Still, DNA extracted with the WaxFree kit led to the highest PCR success rates. Significantly less DNA was extracted from tissue fixed with molecular fixative than with formalin. The highest RNA yields were obtained with Snap-freezing or formalin fixation for <24 h. PCR and RT-PCR success rates differed based on fragment length, preservation method, time in fixative, and extraction method. PCR and RT-PCR amplification success were hindered in >15 year old archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of preservation method, fixation duration, long-term storage of paraffin blocks, and DNA extraction method on the integrity and amplifiability of DNA and morphological preservation from non-cancerous colon, myometrium, and liver tissue and archival cancerous tissue. Snap-frozen specimens were stored at -80 degrees C. Three 10 um sections were used for DNA extraction.

    Summary of Findings:

    Fixation with Sakura molecular fixative resulted in moderate to severe red blood cell swelling and superimposed eosinophilia which were not present in formalin-fixed tissue. There was no statistically significant difference between DNA extraction success rates with different extraction methods. For all tissue types, the WaxFree DNA kit produced the highest yields, followed by the in-house method, the QIAamp FFPE Tissue kit, and lastly the RecoverAll kit, although lower yields were obtained from colon tissue than from myometrium or liver. Spectrophotometry revealed that although higher yields were obtained using the WaxFree DNA kit, the DNA was of lower purity than that obtained by other methods. Significantly less DNA was extracted from tissue fixed with molecular fixative than from tissue fixed with formalin. PCR success rates differed based on fragment length (smaller fragments were more successful), preservation method (snap-frozen and molecule fixative-fixed specimens had higher success than formalin-fixed specimens), time in fixative (24 h was superior to 7 days for formalin fixation), and DNA extraction method (WaxFree DNA extraction was superior while the performance of other extraction methods depended on preservation method). Only the 268 bp amplicon was amplified from >15 year old archival FFPE blocks. Further, this was only possible when extraction was performed using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit, WaxFree DNA kit, or the in-house method and not the RecoverAll kit.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Other Preservative
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    • Neoplastic
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA PCR
    DNA Spectrophotometry
    Morphology H-and-E microscopy
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    Sakura molecular fixative
    Snap frozen
    Biospecimen Preservation Time in fixative <24 h
    7 d
    Storage Storage duration <1 y
    >15 y
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit
    WaxFree DNA kit
    RecoverAll kit
    Phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction
    PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid Beta-globin
    GAPDH
    PCR Specific Length of gene fragment 268 bp
    536 bp
    700 bp
    988 bp
    1327 bp
    Biospecimen Acquisition Biospecimen location Colon
    Myometrium
    Liver
  2. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of preservation method, fixation duration, long-term storage of paraffin blocks, and RNA extraction method on the integrity and amplifiability RNA from non-cancerous colon, myometrium, and liver tissue and archival cancerous tissue. Snap-frozen specimens were stored at -80 degrees C. Three 10 um sections were used for extraction.

    Summary of Findings:

    There was no statistically significant difference between RNA extraction success rates with different extraction methods. For all tissue types, the WaxFree RNA kit and in-house TRIzol methods produced the highest yields, followed by the RNeasy and RecoverAll kits. Colon tissue yielded the least amount of RNA. Spectrophotometry reveled that although higher yields were obtained using the WaxFree RNA kit and TRIzol, the RNA was of lower purity than that obtained by the RNeasy and RecoverAll kits. The highest RNA yields were obtained from specimens preserved by snap-freezing or formalin fixation for <24 h. RT-PCR success rates differed based on fragment length (smaller fragments were more successful), preservation method (generally snap-frozen and molecule fixative-fixed specimens had higher success than formalin-fixed specimens for all extraction methods except WaxFree RNA kit), time in fixative (24 h was superior to 7 days for formalin fixation), and RNA extraction method (performance of each was dependent on preservation method). Neither RT-PCR amplicon was amplified from >15 year old archival FFPE blocks, regardless of extraction method.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Frozen
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    • Neoplastic
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA RT-PCR
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    Sakura molecular fixative
    Snap frozen
    Biospecimen Preservation Time in fixative <24 h
    7 d
    Storage Storage duration <1 y
    >15 y
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method RecoverAll kit
    RNeasy FFPE kit
    WaxFree RNA kit
    TRIzol and chloroform extraction
    RT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid Beta-actin
    RT-PCR Specific Length of gene fragment 621 bp
    816 bp
    Biospecimen Acquisition Biospecimen location Colon
    Myometrium
    Liver

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...