NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Effects of formalin, methacarn, and fineFIX fixatives on RNA preservation.

Author(s): Dotti I, Bonin S, Basili G, Nardon E, Balani A, Siracusano S, Zanconati F, Palmisano S, De Manzini N, Stanta G

Publication: Diagn Mol Pathol, 2010, Vol. 19, Page 112-22

PubMed ID: 20502189 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare the preservation of RNA between different tissue specimens fixed in formalin, methacarn, or FineFIX with fresh frozen controls.

Conclusion of Paper

Total RNA amount recovered was significantly lower in formalin-fixed tissues than in tissues fixed in methacarn or FineFIX. rRNA was degraded in all fixed tissues while mRNA amount was preserved in methacarn-fixed specimens, but lower in formalin and FineFIX-fixed specimens when compared to fresh frozen controls. However, when RT-PCR was used to assess mRNA integrity, specimens fixed in FineFIX showed successful amplification of 438 bp amplicons, similar to methacarn-fixed specimens, whereas only amplicons up to 200 bp long were amplified from formalin-fixed tissue. These results suggest that both methacarn and FineFIX fixation are more conservative methods than formalin fixation.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare the amount and integrity of RNA extracted from fresh frozen tissue with that from tissues fixed in formalin, methacarn, or FineFIX. FineFIX-fixed specimens were preserved and processed using a microwave processor, while formalin and methacarn-fixed specimens were processed conventionally.

    Summary of Findings:

    Total RNA amount recovered was on average 50% lower in formalin-fixed tissues than in tissues fixed in methacarn or FineFIX or fresh frozen tissues. rRNA was degraded in all fixed tissues with RNA integrity number (RIN) values ranging from 2.3 to 2.6 compared with an RIN of 7.4 for fresh frozen tissue where RIN values >6 were defined as good quality RNA. mRNA expression levels, as detected by real time qRT-PCR, were preserved in methacarn-fixed specimens, but lower in formalin and FineFIX-fixed specimens when compared to fresh frozen controls. However, when RT-PCR was used to assess mRNA integrity, specimens fixed in FineFIX showed successful amplification of 438 bp amplicons, similar to methacarn-fixed specimens, whereas only amplicons up to 200 bp long were amplified from formalin-fixed tissue.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Other Preservative
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    RNA Electrophoresis
    RNA Northern blot
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    RNA RT-PCR
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Embedding medium Conventional paraffin embedding
    Microwave-assisted paraffin embedding
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method TRIzol reagent
    Proteinase K-based method
    RT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid ACTB
    RT-PCR Specific Length of gene fragment 77 bp
    177 bp
    291 bp
    438 bp
    651 bp
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid ACTB
    ATP5B
    HPRT
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation FineFIX
    Formalin (buffered)
    Methacarn
    Snap frozen

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...