NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Pre-analytical sample handling effects on tear fluid protein levels.

Author(s): Gijs M, Arumugam S, van de Sande N, Webers CAB, Sethu S, Ghosh A, Shetty R, Vehof J, Nuijts RMMA

Publication: Sci Rep, 2023, Vol. 13, Page 1317

PubMed ID: 36693949 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare the migration of tears on two different types of Schirmer’s Strips and to compare protein content in consecutively collected tear specimens and tear strips subjected to different storage temperatures (fresh, room temperature, 4°C and -20°C versus -80°C) and conditions (frozen dry versus in extraction buffer). The authors also investigated the relationship between migration length and protein content and explored potential effects of extraction buffer volume, use of sonication, and albumin concentration on the recovery of albumin from TrueBlue Strips.

Conclusion of Paper

At each tested volume, tears applied to TrueBlue Strips migrated further than tears applied to Dina Strips. In specimens from 115 patients, migration length was modestly correlated with protein content.  Tear flow rate was highest in the first 10 sec (0.375 mm/s) and then declined. When tear strips were sequentially sampled, protein content decreased with each successive strip until the fourth strip, increasing in the fifth and sixth strip.

Protein content was 21.7% higher in fresh tears than tears stored at -80°C. While protein content was comparable among tear specimens stored at -80°C and -20°C, protein content was lower in tears stored at room temperature (-11.7%) or 4°C (-13%) than -80°C (-11.7% and -13%, respectively).  When the tear strip was submerged in extraction buffer prior to frozen storage, the protein content was slightly higher than when the strip was frozen directly at -80°C but the magnitude of the difference varied among the three patients (1.6%, 10.3% and 11.1%).

Despite different sizes, recovery was comparable for glutathione (0.307 kDa, 68.34 ± 3.36%), lysozyme (14.4 kDa, 61.95 ± 5.09%), and albumin (66 kDa, 61.13 ± 3.82%). Albumin recovery from strips wetted with stock solutions of albumin increased as the volume of extraction buffer increased, and percent recovery increased with the  concentration of albumin in the stock solution, but albumin recovery was not affected by sonication. 

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare the migration of tears on two different types of Schirmer’s Strips and to compare protein content in consecutively collected tear specimens and tear strips subjected to different storage temperatures (fresh, room temperature, 4°C and -20°C versus -80°C) and conditions (frozen dry versus in extraction buffer). The authors also investigated the potential relationship between migration length and protein content and explored potential effects of extraction buffer volume, use of sonication, and albumin concentration on recovery of albumin from TrueBlue Strips. Tears were collected from each eye of 115 healthy subjects using TrueBlue Optics Schirmer’s Strips and migration length was recorded after 5 min.  Unless otherwise specified, strips were immediately frozen at -80°C. Proteins were extracted from strips by placing the strip in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with protease inhibitors at 4°C for 90 min followed by centrifugation. Total protein content was quantified by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. To test effects of collection method, different volumes (2, 5, 10 and 20 µL) of tears collected by a microcapillary pipet and stored at -20°C were applied to both TrueBlue than Dina Schirmer’s Strips and wetting lengths were compared. To test the effects of repeated collection, tears were collected from both eyes of four healthy volunteers on TrueBlue Schirmer’s Strips over the course of 90 min. To test the effects of storage, tears from three healthy volunteers were cut in half and one piece was stored at -80°C (control) while the remaining half was analyzed fresh or stored in a tube with extraction buffer at -80°C and stored for 3 or 24 h at room temperature, 4°C, or -20°C (durations not specified). The effect of elution volume was investigated by adding albumin stock solutions to TrueBlue Strips and, after -80°C storage, eluting in 50-400 µL of extraction buffer; specimens were exposed to ambient conditions or submerged in a sonicating water bath for 5 min.

    Summary of Findings:

    At each tested volume, tears migrated further on TrueBlue Strips than Dina Strips. Tears migrated a shorter distance than an equal volume of PBS but further than an equal volume of plasma; and for all fluids migration was not at a constant of 1mm per µL.  In tear specimens from 115 patients, migration length was positively and modestly correlated with protein content (r=0.6671 P<0.0001).  Tear flow rate was highest in the first 10 sec (0.375 mm/s) and then declined. When tear strips were sequentially sampled, protein content decreased with each successive strip until the fourth strip, but increased in the fifth and sixth strip collected.

    Protein content was 21.7% higher in fresh tears than tears stored at -80°C. While protein content was comparable among tears stored at -80°C and -20°C, protein content was lower when tears were stored at room temperature (-11.7% after 3 h and -8.4% at 24 h) or 4°C (-8.4%) than -80°C.  When the tear strip was submerged in extraction buffer prior to frozen storage, protein content was slightly higher than when the strip was frozen directly at -80°C but the magnitude of the difference varied among the three patients (1.6%, 10.3% and 11.1%).

    An average of 83% of tear volume was recovered from collection strips. Despite different sizes, recovery was comparable for glutathione (0.307 kDa, 68.34 ± 3.36%), lysozyme (14.4 kDa, 61.95 ± 5.09%), and albumin (66 kDa, 61.13 ± 3.82%). Protein recovery from strips wetted with stock solutions of albumin increased as the volume of extraction buffer increased, and the percent recovery increased with albumin concentration but was not affected by sonication. 

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Colorimetric assay
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot sequential collection 1st collection
    2nd collection
    3rd collection
    4th collection
    5th collection
    6th collection
    Biospecimen Acquisition Type of collection container/solution TrueBlue Strip
    Dina Strip
    Storage Storage temperature Room temperature
    4°C
    -20°C
    -80°C
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method 400 µL extraction buffer
    300 µL extraction buffer
    200 µL extraction buffer
    100 µL extraction buffer
    50 µL extraction buffer
    Sonicated
    No Sonication
    Storage Time at room temperature 3 h
    24 h
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Frozen
    None (fresh)
    Storage Storage conditions In extraction buffer
    As dry strip

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...