External Quality Assurance programs for processing methods provide evidence on impact of preanalytical variables.
Author(s): Verderio P, Ciniselli CM, Gaignaux A, Pastori M, Saracino S, Kofanova O, Betsou F
Publication: N Biotechnol, 2022, Vol. 72, Page 29-37
PubMed ID: 36049650 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
This paper investigated the potential effects of preanalytical factors on the analysis of DNA, RNA, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from blood; DNA and RNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tonsil specimens; and DNA from saliva and stool by comparing data obtained at several facilities, each of which used their own workflow. The preanalytical factors examined included storage temperature, extraction kit/automation, elution buffer, inclusion of a DNAse/RNAse step, centrifugation parameters and PBMC freezing parameters.
Conclusion of Paper
When DNA extracted from PAXgene blood specimens was analyzed significant differences in DNA yield were observed among different DNA extraction methods and elution buffers, and significant differences in DNA yield and DNA integrity number (DIN) among differentextraction methods and whether extraction was manual or automated. Although the vast majority of DNA extracts from blood allowed for amplification of a long (length not specified) PCR product, the only identified commonality among the extracts which did not allow for long-PCR was lack of RNAse step. When RNA extracted from PAXgene blood was analyzed, significant differences in RNA purity were observed among different extraction methods and among samples processed with or without a DNAse step. In FFPE specimens, DNA purity and RNA quality indices were affected by extraction method, DNA yields were highest when a Tris-based elution buffer was used, and RNA yields were higher when one section of tissue was used rather than two. PBMC viability was higher when the first centrifugation was for ≤20 min rather than >20 min. While sample size limited the power of statistical analyses of stool, saliva and cfDNA isolated from blood, DNA yields from saliva were higher when extraction was automated and the variability in saliva DNA yields was lower when saliva was stored at room temperature. Higher DNA yields from stool were obtained following magnetic bead-based extraction rather than silica-column based extraction, but this may be attributable to a single outlier. The authors found no clear effects of any of the preanalytical factors examined (storage temperature, extraction method/kit., elution buffer, and use of RNAse) on cfDNA endpoints.
Studies
-
Study Purpose
This study investigated the potential effects of preanalytical factors on the analysis of DNA, RNA, cfDNA and PBMC from blood; DNA and RNA from FFPE tonsil specimens; and DNA from saliva and stool by comparing data obtained at several facilities, each of which used their own workflow The preanalytical factors examined included storage temperature, extraction kit/automation, elution buffer, inclusion of a DNAse/RNAse step, centrifugation parameters and PBMC freezing parameters. This study included data obtained over a 6 year period from 997 participants/representing different processing methods. For each analyte, a PAXgene tube of whole blood (patient characteristics were not specified) was distributed to each participating institution (one tube/analyte): DNA (202-303 participants), RNA (102-127 participants) and cfDNA (34-38 participants). In addition, each participant (74-111 for DNA and 59-62 for RNA) received four 10 µm thick sections of FFPE tonsil (two for DNA and two for RNA), an Omnigene Oral tube of saliva from a healthy volunteer (19-23 participants), and an Omnigene Gut tube containing stool from a healthy volunteer (26-34 participants). DNA and RNA were extracted by each participant by their own methods. Each participant (139-143) collected blood from a healthy volunteer using their anticoagulant of choice for isolation of PBMCs using the method of their choice. DNA was evaluated by spectrophotometry, fluorometry, TapeStation, and long-range and multiplex PCR (details not specified). RNA was evaluated by spectrophotometry, and bioanalyzer. PBMCs were evaluated by flow cytometer, ELISpot, and cell counter.
Summary of Findings:
In blood specimens, DNA extraction method had a significant effect on total DNA yield (P=0.003), with higher yields observed when extraction was with a magnetic bead-based method rather than silica-membrane, salting out, or the “other’ method. Elution of DNA isolated from blood with Tris-based AE buffer led to higher yields than elution with water or TE (P=0.035). DIN of DNA from blood was significantly affected by extraction method (P<0.001) and extraction equipment (P=0.001), with the highest DIN observed in DNA isolated from blood using salting out methods (rather than silica membrane magnetic bead based or “other” methods) and the lowest when automation was employed. All but four DNA extracts from blood allowed for amplification of a long PCR product (length not specified) and of these the only identified commonality was lack of RNAse step. RNA purity was significantly affected by extraction method (P<0.0001) and inclusion of a DNAse step (P<0.0001), with higher purity observed when silica-column based methods were used versus magnetic-bead based or “other“ methods and when a DNAse step was included.
DNA and RNA extracts from FFPE tissues had higher DNA purity and RNA quality indices when silica-based methods rather than magnetic-bead based methods were used for extraction (P<0.001 and P=0.005, respectively), higher DNA yields when a Tris-based elution buffer was used rather than water (P=0.005), and higher RNA yields when one FFPE tissue section was used rather than two (P=0.0001).
PBMC viability was highest when the first centrifugation was for ≤20 min rather than >20 min (significance not provided). No clear effect of anticoagulant (sodium heparin, K2EDTA, Citrate dextrose, CPT, K3EDTA or other), freezing method (Mr. Frosty, progressive rate freezer or other), braking during centrifugation, number of washing steps (1-2 versus 3-4), automated versus manual isolation, or centrifugation speed (≤500, 500-1000, or ≥1000 g) was observed on PBMC viability.
Sample size limited the power of statistical analyses of stool and saliva specimens and cfDNA isolated from blood. However, DNA yields from saliva were higher when extraction was automated and the variability in saliva DNA yield was lower when saliva was stored at room temperature. There was no clear effect of elution buffer or extraction kit type on saliva DNA endpoints. DNA yields from stool were higher when DNA was extracted with a magnetic bead-based method rather than silica-column based kits but the authors state this is mostly attributable to a single outlier. The authors found no clear effects of any of the preanalytical factors (storage temperature, centrifugation temperature/speed/duration/braking, extraction method/kit., elution buffer, and use of RNAse) examined on cfDNA endpoints.
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- Formalin
- PAXgene
- Frozen
Diagnoses:
- Not specified
- Normal
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform DNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer DNA Fluorometry DNA Spectrophotometry DNA PCR Cell count/volume Immunoassay RNA Fluorometry Cell count/volume Light microscopy Cell count/volume Flow cytometry RNA Spectrophotometry Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Biospecimen Acquisition Anticoagulant Plasma preparation tubes (PPT)
Multiple forms evaluated
Potassium EDTA
Sodium heparin
Citrate-phosphate-dextrose
Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Centrifugation With braking
Without braking
Multiple speeds compared
Multiple temperatures compared
Multiple durations compared
Biospecimen Preservation Cooling or freezing method/ rate Mr Frosty
Multiple steps in controlled rate freezer
Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method Manual
Automated
Silica-membrane based method
Salting out based method
Magnetic-bead based method
"Other" method
Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 1 section
2 sections
Analyte Extraction and Purification Rehydration of dried sample/specimen TE
AE
Water
Analyte Extraction and Purification Nucleic acid digestion DNAse added
RNAse added
No DNAse
No RNAse