NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Protein phosphorylation analysis in archival clinical cancer samples by shotgun and targeted proteomics approaches.

Author(s): Gámez-Pozo A, Sánchez-Navarro I, Calvo E, Díaz E, Miguel-Martín M, López R, Agulló T, Camafeita E, Espinosa E, López JA, Nistal M, Vara JÁ

Publication: Mol Biosyst, 2011, Vol. 7, Page 2368-74

PubMed ID: 21617801 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of protein extraction method and formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding on the detection of phosphorylated proteins.

Conclusion of Paper

The protein yields and phosphorylation patterns from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were dependent on the protein extraction method used. Comparable levels of proteins and phosphoproteins were detected by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in frozen and FFPE specimens.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of protein extraction method on protein yield and phosphorylation using FFPE specimens. Protein was extracted from 3 7 µm sections of three different xylene deparaffinized FFPE specimens.

    Summary of Findings:

    The protein yield from FFPE specimens was highest when the SDS method was used for extraction and lowest when the ammonium bicarbonate (ABC)/acetonitrile (ACN) method was used. Staining with Pro-Q diamond revealed differences in the phosphorylation patterns between FFPE specimens extracted using 2%SDS and Qproteome, with higher levels of phosphorylation found after extraction with Qproteome.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Colorimetric assay
    Protein 1D/2D gels
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method FFPE PES (Agilent)
    Qproteome (QIAgen)
    SDS
    Guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl)
    ABC/ACN
  2. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare phosphorylation of FFPE and frozen specimens. Protein was extracted using guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) from 3 7 µm sections of three non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC) and 2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) FFPE biopsy specimens and from 3 NCSLC frozen biopsy specimens.

    Summary of Findings:

    When FFPE specimens were used instead of frozen, comparable, but slightly fewer, numbers of unique proteins (151 versus 156) and phosphoproteins (49 versus 56) were identified. Of these, 28 phosphoproteins were identified in both FFPE and frozen specimens. In general, cellular compartments were equally represented using FFPE and frozen specimens, although using FFPE specimens, membrane-related proteins were slightly under-represented. The authors report that preservation method had no effect on the detection of phosphoproteins. Selected reaction monitoring was comparable when using frozen and FFPE specimens.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein LC-MS or LC-MS/MS
    Peptide LC-MS or LC-MS/MS
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    Frozen
    Preaquisition Diagnosis/ patient condition NSCLC
    RCC

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...