NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Recovery of microarray-quality RNA from frozen EDTA blood samples.

Author(s): Beekman JM, Reischl J, Henderson D, Bauer D, Ternes R, Peña C, Lathia C, Heubach JF

Publication: J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods, 2009, Vol. 59, Page 44-9

PubMed ID: 19028589 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine if the PAXgene system allows for extraction of previously frozen EDTA blood.

Conclusion of Paper

When RNA was extracted from frozen EDTA blood using the QIAamp kit, the RNA yield and integrity were low, but when EDTA blood was extracted using the PAXgene kit the yield and integrity were much higher, even when the blood was stored at room temperature for 3 h prior to freezing. However, the highest yield and RNA quality was obtained from specimens collected in PAXgene tubes.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of delayed freezing, processing, and extraction methods on RNA quantity and quality and microarray analysis of EDTA whole blood. RNA obtained from EDTA blood that was frozen immediately after collection, thawed 2 h on ice, and extracted using the QIAamp kit (standard protocol) or PAXgene kit (protocol A), or obtained from EDTA blood that was stored at room temperature for 3 h prior to freezing, and processed like protocol A (protocol B) was compared to RNA obtained from blood collected into a Paxgene tube, frozen immediately, and thawed for 16-21 h at room temperature prior to extraction using the Paxgene kit (reference protocol).

    Summary of Findings:

    When RNA was extracted using the standard protocol, the average yield was 0.07 ug/mL, while an average of 2.84 ug/mL was obtained using the reference protocol. This low yield was not always sufficient, even when pooled, to determine the RNA integrity number (RIN) or to use for microarray analysis. Average RNA yields of 1.76 and 1.29 ug/mL were obtained using protocols A and B, respectively. RINs were lower in RNA obtained by protocols A (6.1) and B (6.4) than RNA obtained using the reference protocol (9.8). When RNA was extracted using the reference protocol, the lowest GAPDH 3 prime to 5 prime ratios, scaling factor and interindividual variability, and the highest percent present calls were obtained. In contrast, when RNA was extracted using the standard protocol, the highest GAPDH 3 prime to 5 prime ratios, and scaling factor, and the lowest percent present calls were obtained. RNA obtained by protocols A and B performed similarly, and was more like RNA obtained by the reference protocol than like RNA obtained by the standard protocol. The call concordance percentages between the specimens obtained using the reference protocol and either the standard protocol, protocol A or protocol B were 77.1%, 87.5% and 85.2%, respectively.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    • PAXgene
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    RNA DNA microarray
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Type of collection container/solution Paxgene tube
    Potassium EDTA tube
    Storage Thaw duration 2 h
    16-21 h
    Storage Thaw temperature/condition On ice
    Room temperature
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method PAXgene kit
    QIAamp kit
    Storage Time at room temperature 0 h
    3 h
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Frozen
    PAXgene

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...