NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Immunohistochemical staining of plastic embedded bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens after microwave heating.

Author(s): McCluggage WG, Roddy S, Whiteside C, Burton J, McBride H, Maxwell P, Bharucha H

Publication: J Clin Pathol, 1995, Vol. 48, Page 840-4

PubMed ID: 7490318 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of processing methods involving different embedding materials on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and morphological preservation in bone marrow trephine biopsies.

Conclusion of Paper

19 of 22 antibodies gave IHC staining results that were comparable between acetic acid-formol saline-fixed, paraffin-embedded, decalcified bone marrow trephine biopsies and those that were formalin-fixed, embedded in plastic (Polarbed 812 epoxy resin), and treated by microwave heating in citrate buffer prior to immunostaining. CD20 immunostaining was superior in formalin-fixed plastic-embedded specimens, while neutrophil elastase and CD61 immunostaining were superior in acetic-acid formol saline-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Cellular morphology was better in formalin-fixed plastic-embedded specimens which were able to be cut into 1 uM sections as opposed to 5 uM sections.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of fixation method, embedding material, decalcification, and antigen retrieval on IHC staining and morphological preservation in bone marrow trephine biopsies. Specimens designated for paraffin embedding were fixed in 3% acetic acid in 10% unbuffered formol saline for 1.5-3 h and decalcified with EDTA. Specimens designated for plastic embedding were fixed overnight in 10% neutral buffered formalin and underwent antigen retrieval prior to staining.

    Summary of Findings:

    19 of 22 antibodies gave IHC staining results that were comparable between acetic acid-formol saline-fixed, paraffin-embedded, decalcified bone marrow trephine biopsies and those that were formalin-fixed, embedded in plastic (Polarbed 812 epoxy resin), and treated by microwave heating in citrate buffer prior to immunostaining. CD20 immunostaining was superior in formalin-fixed plastic-embedded specimens, while neutrophil elastase and CD61 immunostaining were superior in acetic acid-formol saline-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. Cellular morphology was better in formalin-fixed plastic-embedded specimens which were able to be cut into 1 uM sections as opposed to 5 uM sections.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    • Normal
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    • Neoplastic - Lymphoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Immunohistochemistry
    Morphology H-and-E microscopy
    Morphology Light microscopy
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Acetic acid-formol saline
    Formalin (buffered)
    Biospecimen Preservation Embedding medium Epoxy resin
    Paraffin
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Decalcification solution/ duration EDTA pH 7.0
    None
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Antigen retrieval Microwaved in citrate buffer
    None
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Type of slide 1 uM section
    5 uM section

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...