NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Genome-wide scans using archived neonatal dried blood spot samples.

Author(s): Hollegaard MV, Grauholm J, Børglum A, Nyegaard M, Nørgaard-Pedersen B, Ørntoft T, Mortensen PB, Wiuf C, Mors O, Didriksen M, Thorsen P, Hougaard DM

Publication: BMC Genomics, 2009, Vol. 10, Page 297

PubMed ID: 19575812 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of DNA extraction and whole genome amplification (WGA) method on genome-wide analysis of archival dried blood spots (DBS).

Conclusion of Paper

Extraction of DNA from DBS with Extract-N-Amp blood PCR kit (ENA) followed by amplification with Repli-g resulted in the highest average call rate and the lowest call conflict with fresh reference DNA from venous blood specimens. Using 3 disks for DNA extraction instead of 1 did not improve call rates or decrease conflict rates. Further, the age of the DBS (15-25 y) had no significant effects on genotyping performance.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of storage duration of DBS, DNA extraction method, and WGA method on genome-wide analysis of archival DBS from volunteers and neonates enrolled in a genetic schizophrenia study. DBS from 24 neonates were stored for 15-25 years at -24 degrees C. DNA was extracted from 1 or 3 3.2 mm disks with ENA or QIAamp DNA blood micro kit (QIAamp), amplified using one of 3 different WGA kits, and hybridized to Illumina Infinium HD Human610-Quad BeadChips. Results were compared to those obtained using DNA extracted from venous blood with the Maxwell 16 DNA purification system.

    Summary of Findings:

    Extraction of DNA from DBS with ENA followed by amplification with Repli-g resulted in the highest average call rate (>99%) and the lowest call conflict with fresh reference DNA from venous blood specimens (0.02-0.03%). When DNA was extracted with QIAamp, amplification with REPLI-g led to high variability in call and conflict rates, but amplification with GenomePlex Single Cell whole genome amplification kit led to >97% call rates and less than 0.038% conflict with the reference DNA. Using 3 disks for DNA extraction instead of 1 did not improve call rates or decrease conflict rates. Further, the storage duration of DBS had no significant effects on genotyping performance.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Other Preservative
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    • Schizophrenia
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA DNA microarray
    DNA Fluorometry
    DNA Whole genome amplification
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Air-dried
    None (fresh)
    Storage Storage duration 15-25 years
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method Maxwell 16 DNA purification system
    Extract-N-Amp blood PCR kit
    QIAamp DNA blood micro kit
    Whole genome amplification Specific Nucleic acid amplification Qiagen REPLI-g kit
    GenomePlex Complete WGA kit (GPlex2))
    GenomePlex Single Cell whole genome amplification kit (GPLex4)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 1 x 3.2 mm disk
    3 x 3.2 mm disk

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...