NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Comparison of immunocytochemical sensitivity between formalin-fixed and alcohol-fixed specimens reveals the diagnostic value of alcohol-fixed cytocentrifuged preparations in malignant effusion cytology.

Author(s): Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Mitsuya T

Publication: Am J Clin Pathol, 2011, Vol. 136, Page 934-42

PubMed ID: 22095380 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine if alcohol-fixed, cytocentrifuged, malignant effusions are suitable for cytological diagnosis.

Conclusion of Paper

The immunocytochemical (ICC) sensitivities for reactive mesothelioma (RM) and adenocarcinoma were comparable for most antibodies in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks (CB) and cytocentrifuged specimens, but sensitivity for diffuse malignant mesothelioma (DMM) showed little correlation between cytocentrifuged and CB specimens. Heat induced antigen retrieval (HIAR) increased sensitivity of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1), small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein IMP3 (IMP3) and thyroid transcription factor -1 (TTF-1).

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare ICC staining in cytocentrifuged alcohol-fixed specimens and formalin-fixed cell blocks from malignant effusions and to determine the effects of antigen retrieval. Malignant effusion smears were fixed in 95% ethanol and papanicolaou-stained before being transferred to slides and immunostained. The remainder of the effusion cells were fixed in 20% formalin, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned for immunostaining. The malignant effusions came from more than 10 tissue sources.

    Summary of Findings:

    The ICC sensitivities for RM and adenocarcinoma were comparable for most antibodies in CB and cytocentrifuged specimens, but sensitivity for DMM showed little correlation between cytocentrifuged and CB specimens. Without antigen retrieval, the sensitivity of WT1 for RM in cytocentrifuged specimens was 2%, but using HIAR the sensitivity of WT1 in cytocentrifuged specimens increased to 45%, but that was still lower than the 77% found in CB specimens. Calretinin sensitivity for RM was similar in cytocentrifuged and CB specimens when only cytoplasm was evaluated (92% and 96%, respectively) but decreased to 26% in the cyocentrifuged specimens when only the nucleus was considered. Sensitivity of TTF-1 increased from 57% in cytocentrifuged specimens without HIAR to 74% with HIAR and was 75% in CB specimens. The authors report a strong association of staining for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), glucose transporter protein-1 (GLUT-1), adenocarcinoma-associated markers epithelial antigen (Ber-EP4), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Leu-M1, calretinin, D2-40, mesothelial cell (HBME-1), and desmin staining in CB and cytocentrifuged specimens.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Ethanol
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    • Neoplastic - Lymphoma
    • Neoplastic - Other
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Immunohistochemistry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Antigen retrieval None
    Heat induced
    Immunohistochemistry Specific Targeted peptide/protein EMA
    IMP3
    GLUT-1
    CEA
    Ber-EP4
    MOC-31
    Leu-M1
    Calretinin
    D2-40
    HBME-1
    WT-1
    C5/6
    Desmin
    TTF-1
    CA125
    CK7
    CK20
    Preaquisition Diagnosis/ patient condition Reactive mesothelioma
    Diffuse malignant mesothelioma
    Adenocarcinoma
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Ethanol
    Formalin (buffered)

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...