Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota - effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies.
Author(s): Panek M, Čipčić Paljetak H, Barešić A, Perić M, Matijašić M, Lojkić I, Vranešić Bender D, Krznarić Ž, Verbanac D
Publication: Sci Rep, 2018, Vol. 8, Page 5143
PubMed ID: 29572539 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
This paper compared the effects of fecal specimen collection, specimen storage protocols, and bacterial DNA extraction methods on DNA yield and quality (A260/A280) and on the microbial profiles obtained using two different next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms.
Conclusion of Paper
A slightly higher DNA yield was obtained when specimens were collected with the OMNIgene.GUT System than when collected in a sterile container, regardless of storage time (0 or 14 days at room temperature and frozen, respectively). While relative abundance of bacterial phyla detected were comparable between OMNIgene.GUT specimens processed immediately and the specimens collected in a sterile container and processed immediately and after 14 days at -20°C significant differences were found at the genus level. Mean DNA yields, A260/A280 absorbance ratios, and extraction of all families other than Bacteroidaceae were significantly higher when extraction was performed with the MP Kit than the MO BIO or QIA kits. Overall, a higher average number of operational taxonomic unit (OTUs) per specimen was detected with the MiSeq platform compared to the Ion Torrent platform, with significant differences at both the family and genus levels.
Studies
-
Study Purpose
This study compared the effects of fecal specimen collection, specimen storage protocols, and bacterial DNA extraction methods on DNA yield and quality (A260/A280) and on the microbial profiles obtained using two different NGS platforms. Specimens were collected from four healthy participants (age range: 33–42 years, 2 males and 2 females) in a sterile container (fresh) and with the OMNIgene.GUT Kit. Fresh specimens were aliquoted (1-2 g) and one aliquot was processed within a few hours of collection while the remaining aliquot was frozen at -20°C for 14 days. Specimens collected with the OMNIgene.GUT Kit were aliquoted (400-500 mg) and one aliquot was processed within a few hours of collection and the other was stored at room temperature for 14 days. DNA was extracted from each aliquot using the MP Biomedicals Fast DNA SPIN Kit for Feces, the QIAgen QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit, and the MO BIO Power Fecal DNA Isolation Kit. DNA quantity and quality (A260/A280) were determined by spectrophotometry (Nanodrop 2000) and fluorometry (Qubit 3.0). Fecal microbial profiles were analyzed by amplification of the 16S rRNA gene using the Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit and sequencing on the Ilumina MiSeq and using the 16S Ion Metagenomics Kit and sequencing on the Ion Torrent PGM platform. Alpha diversity was assessed using observed OTUs, Chao1 index, and PD_whole_tree index. Differences in beta diversity were presented as principal coordinate analysis plots.
Summary of Findings:
A slightly higher DNA yield was obtained when specimens were collected with the OMNIgene.GUT System than the fresh specimen, regardless of storage time (0 or 14 days at room temperature and frozen, respectively). While relative abundance of bacterial phyla detected were comparable among specimens collected with the OMNIgene.GUT System and those collected in a sterile container and either processed immediately or stored at -20C, significant differences were found at the genus level (P=0.003 and 0.004, respectively). Mean DNA yields were significantly higher when extraction was performed with the MP Kit than the MO BIO or QIA Kits (0.34 ± 0.018 ng/μl versus 0.09 ± 0.03 and 0.12 ± 0.02 ng/μl; respectively, P<0.001, both). The mean A260/A280 absorbance ratios were highest following extraction with the MP and QIA Kits (2.00 and 1.91, respectively) and the mean A260/A280 for the MO BIO Kit (1.55) was significantly lower (P<0.001, both). Overall, a higher average number of OTUs per specimen was detected with the MiSeq platform compared to the Ion Torrent platform (257.806 ± 23.076 versus 110.512 ± 7.529), with significant differences at both the family and genus levels (P=0.026 and P<0.001, respectively). Using the fresh immediately processed specimen as a reference point, the MO BIO Kit extracted a higher proportion of Bacteroidaceae (48.6%) compared to the MP and QIA extraction kits (33.4% and 24.8%, respectively), but the MP Kit was 1.9- to 3.2-fold more efficient at extracting all other families compared to the other two extraction kits (P<0.001, for all).
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- None (Fresh)
- Other Preservative
- Frozen
Diagnoses:
- Normal
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform DNA Next generation sequencing DNA Spectrophotometry Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Storage Storage conditions Fresh
Frozen
OMNIgene.GUT at room temperature
Storage Time at room temperature 14 days
Next generation sequencing Specific Technology platform Ilumina MiSeq
Ion Torrent PGM platform
Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method MP Biomedicals Fast DNA SPIN Kit for Feces
QIAgen QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit
MO BIO Power Fecal DNA Isolation Kit
Storage Storage duration 0 days
14 days
