NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Deep clonal profiling of formalin fixed paraffin embedded clinical samples.

Author(s): Holley T, Lenkiewicz E, Evers L, Tembe W, Ruiz C, Gsponer JR, Rentsch CA, Bubendorf L, Stapleton M, Amorese D, Legendre C, Cunliffe HE, McCullough AE, Pockaj B, Craig D, Carpten J, Von Hoff D, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Barrett MT

Publication: PLoS One, 2012, Vol. 7, Page e50586

PubMed ID: 23226320 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of formalin fixation and paraffin embedding and whole genome amplification (WGA) on analysis of copy number and single nucleotide variants (SNV) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) in flow cytometry-sorted cells.

Conclusion of Paper

Generally, flow cytometry sorting of cells from FFPE specimens allowed for reliable copy number analysis by aCGH, but the aneuploid and diploid peaks tended to be a bit broader. When DNA from FFPE specimens was subjected to WGA with the Ovation WGA FFPE kit, next generation sequencing and aCGH analysis were successful, but some loss in aCGH resolution was noted.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of formalin fixation and paraffin embedding and WGA on analysis of copy number and SNV by aCGH and NGS in flow cytometry-sorted cells. Details of formalin fixation were not specified but were stated to be standard. FFPE specimens were rehydrated and digested, frozen and DAPI stained prior to flow cytometry. Matched specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 degrees C. DNA was extracted from sorted FFPE nuclei using a modified QIAamp micro kit protocol, after which, DNA was amplified with Ovation WGA FFPE.

    Summary of Findings:

    The diploid and aneuploid nuclei histograms from FFPE specimens were wider than from matched frozen specimens indicating more DNA fragmentation. However, when 50,000 sorted FFPE nuclei were used rather than 10,000 or 25,000 cells, there was a robust aCGH signal, allowing for detection of loss of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 8 (TNFAI8). 19 of the top 20 ranked amplicons from FFPE specimens had >0.9 overlap with the same interval in the matched frozen specimen. All FFPE tumor specimens had clinically relevant changes in copy number. Amplification with the Ovation WGA FFPE kit led to increased signal but also led to increased non-specific amplification and decreased resolution. However, the Adrenomedullin 2 (ADM2) aCGH intervals were comparable between frozen specimens, amplified and unamplified FFPE specimens. The genome profiles of frozen, amplified and unamplified FFPE specimens by next generation sequencing were identical, as determined by the ADM2 interval. 22 mutations identified in a cell line were generally detected in all specimen types, but 2 of the mutations were not called in the fresh frozen or unamplified FFPE specimens. The authors hypothesize this was possibly due to allelic drift in the cell line or non-tumor cells in the sorted specimens.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Array CGH
    DNA Whole genome amplification
    DNA Next generation sequencing
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    Frozen
    Whole genome amplification Specific Nucleic acid amplification Amplified
    Unamplified
    Array CGH Specific Template/input amount 10,000 nuclei
    25,000 nuclei
    50,000 nuclei

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...