NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

An evaluation of tyramide signal amplification and archived fixed and frozen tissue in microarray gene expression analysis.

Author(s): Karsten SL, Van Deerlin VM, Sabatti C, Gill LH, Geschwind DH

Publication: Nucleic Acids Res, 2002, Vol. 30, Page E4

PubMed ID: 11788730 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper compared cDNA microarray performance of RNA extracted from snap frozen, formalin fixed, or ethanol fixed postmortem brain specimens, as well as evaluated the use of tyramide signal amplification.

Conclusion of Paper

Snap frozen specimens generated the most reliable cDNA micoarray results. Although somewhat lower than frozen specimens, microarray analysis of RNA extracted from ethanol fixed specimens yielded acceptable results, while results obtained with formalin specimens were variable and displayed low signal intensity. Direct labeling of RNA extracted from formalin fixed specimens reduced the percentage of spots generating a signal to 30% from the 56% observed in samples that had undergone tyramide signal amplification.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    This study compared cDNA microarray performance of RNA extracted from snap frozen, formalin fixed, or ethanol fixed postmortem brain specimens, as well as evaluated the use of tyramide signal amplification. All brain specimens evaluated were collected at autopsy.

    Summary of Findings:

    A comparison of cDNA microarray results revealed that the percentage of spots generating a signal differed as a result of preservation method, with 94%, 99%, and 56% of spots generating a signal for RNA extracted from snap frozen, ethanol fixed, and formalin fixed specimens, respectively. Direct labeling of RNA extracted from formalin fixed specimens reduced the percentage of spots generating a signal to 30%. Formalin fixed specimens also generated low signal intensity and high background compared to the other preservation methods examined. Reproducibility was high for frozen specimens, acceptable for ethanol fixed specimens, and highly variable for formalin fixed specimens. cDNA synthesis and dye incorporation efficiency were also reduced in formalin fixed specimens, which were not improved by inclusion of a RNA preheating step at 70 degrees C for 1 hour.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Frozen
    • Ethanol
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    • Autopsy
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA DNA microarray
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Ethanol
    Formalin (buffered)
    Snap frozen
    DNA microarray Specific Signal amplification Tyramide signal amplification
    No signal amplification
    Preaquisition Postmortem interval 8-11 h
    DNA microarray Specific RNA incubation temperature 70 degrees C for 1 h

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...