NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Comparison and optimisation of microRNA extraction from the plasma of healthy pregnant women.

Author(s): Parker VL, Cushen BF, Gavriil E, Marshall B, Waite S, Pacey A, Heath PR

Publication: Mol Med Rep, 2021, Vol. 23, Page

PubMed ID: 33576446 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper compared the microRNA (miRNA, miR) yield and levels of individual miRNAs after isolation using the Maxwell RSC and miRNeasy Kit with and without inclusion of Proteinase K or RNA carriers (MS2 or glycogen) from 100-500 µL plasma of one pregnant woman. The effect of extraction parameters on the recovery of spiked-in controls was also investigated.

Conclusion of Paper

While variable among the optimized methods, miRNA concentration and percentage were comparable between the two extraction methods. However, recovery of the spiked-in controls was slightly less consistent using the Maxwell RSC than the miRNeasy Kit. Welch’s ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of plasma input volume on normalized levels of hsa‑miR‑222‑3p and inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen on normalized levels of hsa‑miR‑148‑3p and hsa‑miR‑222‑3p. Pairwise analysis found lower normalized levels of miR-222-3p with an input volume of 100 µL plasma instead of 200 µL for the Maxwell Kit. Inclusion of Proteinase K along with glycogen or MS2 in the extraction with the Maxwell Kit led to higher normalized hsa‑miR‑148‑3p levels than when extraction included MS2 but not Proteinase K but no significant differences in normalized hsa‑miR‑148‑3p levels were found with inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen when extraction was with miRNeasy. Pair-wise comparisons did not identify any significant differences in hsa‑miR‑148‑3p with inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen. Importantly, while there was no difference in normalized levels of the four miRNAs between kits when extraction was performed using the manufacturer specified conditions, use of the Maxwell Kit rather than the miRNeasy Kit resulted in significantly higher variance in normalized levels of three of the four miRNAs investigated. UniSp6 quantification cycle (Cq) values were higher in the no template control than the samples but a comparison of the global mean UniSp6 values versus inhibition controls did not find a significant difference.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    This study compared the microRNA (miRNA, miR) yield and levels of individual miRNAs after isolation using the Maxwell RSC and miRNeasy Kit with and without inclusion of Proteinase K or RNA carriers (MS2 or glycogen) from 100-500 µL plasma of a pregnant woman. Blood was collected using a 21-gauge needle into sodium citrate vacutainer tubes from a pregnant woman during the 9’th week of gestation and stored upright on ice for <2 h. Plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 1,900 x g for 10 min at 4˚C and stored frozen at -80°C. Specimens were thawed at room temperature and platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was obtained by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 10 min at 4˚C. RNA was extracted from PPP spiked with UniSp2, UniSp4, and UniSp5 spike‑in mix using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit with different plasma volumes (100, 200, or 500 µL), with or without 60 µL Proteinase K or the RNA carriers MS2 (2.5 µg) or glycogen (5 µg) and with the Maxwell RSC miRNA from Tissue and Plasma or Serum Kit using 100 or 200 µL plasma with or without addition of 24 µL Proteinase K, MS2 (0.5 or 1 µg), or glycogen (2 µg). The percentage of small RNA that was miRNA and miRNA concentration were assayed using an Agilent Small RNA Chip on a 2100 Bioanalyzer. Levels of hsa‑miR‑222‑3p, hsa‑let‑7i‑3p, hsa‑miR‑148‑3p, and hsa‑miR‑30e‑5p were quantified by real-time RT-PCR. Additionally, extraction efficiency was quantified by real-time RT-PCR amplification of UniSp2, UniSp4, and UniSp5.

    Summary of Findings:

    While variable among the optimized methods, miRNA concentration and percentage were comparable between the two extraction kits. However, recovery of the spiked-in controls was less consistent using the Maxwell RSC than the miRNeasy Kit with a fold difference in recovery of spiked-in controls of 5.63- 8.05 and 6.69-7.88, respectively, and a variance in Cqs of 2.96-5.26 and 0.72 -1.90 cycles, respectively. Welch’s ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of plasma input volume on normalized levels of hsa‑miR‑222‑3p (P=0.02) and inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen on normalized levels of hsa‑miR‑148‑3p (Welch's ANOVA, P=0.0006) and hsa‑miR‑222‑3p (Welch’s ANOVA P=0.046). Pairwise analysis found higher normalized levels of miR-222-3p with an input volume of 200 µL instead of 100 µL using the Maxwell Kit with no proteinase or carriers (P=0.02) but no differences were found using the miRNeasy Kit. Higher normalized levels of miR-222-3p were found when extraction was from 200 µL of plasma with miRNeasy (no carrier) than when from 100 µL plasma using the Maxwell Kit without a carrier (P=0.02). In pair-wise comparisons, inclusion of Proteinase K along with glycogen or MS2 in the Maxwell Kit led to higher normalized levels of hsa‑miR‑148‑3p than when extraction included MS2 but not Proteinase K (P=0.04 and P=0.048, respectively), but no significant differences in normalized hsa‑miR‑148‑3p levels were found with inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen when extraction was with miRNeasy. Pair-wise comparisons did not identify any significant differences in hsa‑miR‑148‑3p with inclusion of Proteinase K, MS2, or glycogen. Importantly, while there was no difference in normalized levels of the four miRNAs between kits when extraction was performed using the manufacturer specified conditions, use of the Maxwell Kit rather than the miRNeasy Kit resulted in significantly higher variance in normalized levels of let‑7i‑3p (P=0.03), hsa‑miR‑30e‑5p (P<0.0001), and miR‑222‑3p (P=0.003). UniSp6 Cq values were higher in the no template control than the samples but a comparison of the global mean UniSp6 values versus inhibition controls did not find a significant difference. Further, no hemolysis was found.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Pregnant
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 100 µL
    200 µL
    500 µL
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid hsa‑miR‑222‑3p
    hsa‑let‑7i‑3p
    hsa‑miR‑148‑3p
    hsa‑miR‑30e‑5p
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Protein digestion Proteinase K used
    No proteinase K used
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit
    Maxwell RSC miRNA Tissue or Plasma or Serum
    Glycogen added
    MS2 added
    No Glycogen or MS2 added

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...