NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Successful application of microarray technology to microdissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Author(s): Coudry RA, Meireles SI, Stoyanova R, Cooper HS, Carpino A, Wang X, Engstrom PF, Clapper ML

Publication: J Mol Diagn, 2007, Vol. 9, Page 70-9

PubMed ID: 17251338 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare RNA yield, quality, and cDNA microarray results among cell populations isolated by laser capture microdissection (LCM)or tissue scraping, differentially preserved by freezing in OCT or formalin fixation and paraffin embedding (FFPE).

Conclusion of Paper

Microarray analysis of RNA extracted from LCM FFPE and OCT frozen case-matched controls generated expression data that was well correlated. Further, cell capture method (LCM versus tissue scraping) did not significantly impact RNA yield or quality, while a 2 hour delay in preservation for frozen but not FFPE specimens resulted in evidence of RNA degradation.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine if the quality of extracted RNA is influenced by (1) the preservation method, (2) the method of cell capture, or (3) a 2 hour room temperature delay in preservation.

    Summary of Findings:

    As determined by examination of bioanalyzer generated electropherogram patterns, RNA quality was compromised in FFPE specimens in comparison to OCT frozen case-matched controls. A 2 hour delay in frozen preservation, but not formalin fixation, yielded evidence of RNA degradation; while both methods of cell population capture (LCM, tissue scraping) generated RNA of identical quality.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • OCT
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    OCT
    Storage Time at room temperature 2 h
    0 h
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Cell capture method Laser-capture microdissection
    Slide scraping
  2. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine if the yield, quality, or microarray performance of extracted RNA amplified via in vitro transcription was affected by biospecimen preservation method.

    Summary of Findings:

    While the yield of amplified RNA was equivalent among OCT frozen and FFPE specimens, the length of RNA fragments generated was slightly shorter for FFPE compared to OCT frozen specimens, 400 bp versus 500 bp, respectively. Successful RT-PCR amplification of differentially sized products was not significantly affected by preservation method. FFPE and case-matched OCT frozen specimens generated microarray expression data that was well correlated (r=0.80-0.96), as well as an equivalent percentage of expressed genes.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • OCT
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA DNA microarray
    RNA Electrophoresis
    RNA RT-PCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    OCT

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...