NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Saliva Alternative to Upper Respiratory Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.

Author(s): Byrne RL, Kay GA, Kontogianni K, Aljayyoussi G, Brown L, Collins AM, Cuevas LE, Ferreira DM, Fraser AJ, Garrod G, Hill H, Hughes GL, Menzies S, Mitsi E, Owen SI, Patterson EI, Williams CT, Hyder-Wright A, Adams ER, Cubas-Atienzar AI

Publication: Emerg Infect Dis, 2020, Vol. 26, Page 2770-2771

PubMed ID: 32917294 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper compared viral loads of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID, COVID-19, COVID19), in matched self-collected, frozen saliva specimens with healthcare worker–collected nasal and throat swab specimens.

Conclusion of Paper

Overall, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 10.9% of self-collected saliva and 12.7% of matched healthcare worker-collected nasal and throat swab specimens; the differences in viral loads between specimen types were statistically insignificant.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    This study compared viral loads of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID, COVID-19, COVID19), in matched self-collected saliva specimens with healthcare worker–collected nasal and throat swab specimens. Swab specimens were collected by healthcare-workers (details not provided) from 110 patients (61 females, 49 males) with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, placed in Amies transport medium, and RNA was immediately extracted from the swabs using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit. Saliva was then self-collected from the same participants via funnel into a sterile cryotube. Saliva was stored at -80°C until RNA extraction using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit. Viral loads were quantified using the genesig Real-Time Coronavirus COVID-19 PCR.

    Summary of Findings:

    Overall, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 12 (10.9%) self-collected saliva and 14 matched healthcare worker- collected (12.7%) nasal and throat swab specimens. Viral loads for positive specimens ranged from 36 to 3.3 × 106 copies/mL; differences between specimen types were statistically insignificant (P=0.1955). Viral loads were low (<10 copies/mL) in the nasal/throat swabs of the two patients with SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in the healthcare worker collected nasal/throat swabs and negative in self-collected saliva specimens. The authors state the difference in SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection may be attributed to different processing times of the two specimens or reduced stability of RNA due to freeze/thaw cycling of the saliva specimen.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Pneumonia/Respiratory Infection
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Biospecimen location Saliva
    Nasal cavity
    Throat
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of cell acquisition Self-collected saliva
    Healthcare worker-collected swabs
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid SARS-CoV-2
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Frozen
    Amies transport media
    Storage Freeze/thaw cycling 0 cycles
    1 cycle

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...