NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Expression analysis on archival material revisited: isolation and quantification of RNA extracted from FFPE samples.

Author(s): Deben C, Zwaenepoel K, Boeckx C, Wouters A, Pauwels P, Peeters M, Lardon F, Baay M, Deschoolmeester V

Publication: Diagn Mol Pathol, 2013, Vol. 22, Page 59-64

PubMed ID: 23370428 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of using a newer version of the RNeasy formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) kit rather than an older version on RNA yield and quality and to compare quantification by Nanodrop spectrophotometer with that determined with the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer.

Conclusion of Paper

Generally, RNA obtained from FFPE specimens using the two different RNeasy FFPE kits was comparable, but the newer kit, including DNAse I, removed more DNA than the older kit containing gDNA eliminator columns. The concentration of RNA extracted from FFPE specimens was, on average, 32.03% higher when measured by the Nanodrop spectrophotometer than when measured by the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer, but this difference could be eliminated by 1:4 or 1:8 dilution of RNA in water before spectrophotometric measurements.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using a newer version of the RNeasy FFPE kit which contained DNAse I rather than an older version using gDNA eliminator columns on RNA yield and quality. RNA was extracted from 1-2 10 um FFPE sections of colon, kidney or stomach. The authors do not specify any diagnoses.

    Summary of Findings:

    The yield, ratio of absorbance (A) at 260 to 280 and to 230, and real-time qPCR cycle threshold (CT) values were comparable between RNA isolated from FFPE specimens using two different RNeasy FFPE kits. However, after isolation of RNA with the RNeasy FFPE kit containing the gDNA eliminator columns, 1799.5 ng DNA remained in the specimen, but after isolation of RNA with the RNeasy FFPE kit containing DNAse I, only 958.4 ng DNA remained.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Fluorometry
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method RNeasy FFPE kit with gDNA eliminator column
    RNeasy FFPE kit with DNAse I
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Nucleic acid digestion DNAse I
    Eliminator column
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid Hydroxymethylbilane synthase
  2. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare measurement of RNA from FFPE colorectal tumors with the Nanodrop spectrophotometer and with the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer.

    Summary of Findings:

    The concentration of RNA extracted from FFPE specimens was, on average, 32.03% higher when measured by the Nanodrop spectrophotometer than when measured by the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer, but this difference could be eliminated by 1:4 or 1:8 dilution of RNA in water before spectrophotometric measurements.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Fluorometry
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Biospecimen components Undiluted
    Diluted 1:2
    Diluted 1:4
    Diluted 1:8
    Spectrophotometry Specific Technology platform Qubit 2 fluorometer

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...