NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Estimation of estrogen receptor content in fine-needle aspirates from breast cancer using the monoclonal antibody 1D5 and microwave oven processing: correlation with paraffin embedded and frozen sections determinations.

Author(s): Schmitt FC, Bento MJ, Amendoeira I

Publication: Diagn Cytopathol, 1995, Vol. 13, Page 347-51

PubMed ID: 8599924 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare estrogen receptor (ER) immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in surgically excised breast cancer specimens and fine needle aspirates.

Conclusion of Paper

Generally more intense staining was observed using the 1D5 antibody for ER IHC staining of ethanol-fixed FNA and formalin-fixed surgical excision specimens than when the H222 antibody was used for ER IHC staining of snap-frozen sections. With ER staining in snap-frozen sections taken as the standard, immunostaining in FNA showed a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 100% when 31 specimens were examined, while ER staining of formalin-fixed surgical specimens showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The one discrepant FNA case was non-interpretable due to high background staining but was positive in both the formalin-fixed and snap-frozen sections.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of antibody type and preservation method, and to compare surgically excised breast cancer specimens and FNA with respect to ER IHC staining results. The time period between fine needle aspiration and surgical excision ranged from 1-28 d. The ethanol-fixed FNA smears were processed in a microwave-oven.

    Summary of Findings:

    When a 5 class scoring system was used (-, +, ++, +++, ++++) more intense staining was generally observed using the 1D5 antibody for ER IHC staining of ethanol-fixed FNA and formalin-fixed surgical excision specimens than when the H222 antibody was used for ER IHC staining of snap-frozen sections. With ER staining in snap-frozen sections taken as the standard and a two class scoring system, immunostaining in FNA showed a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 100% when 31 specimens were examined, while ER staining of formalin-fixed surgical specimens showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The one discrepant FNA case was non-interpretable due to high background staining but was positive in both the formalin-fixed and snap-frozen sections.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Ethanol
    • Frozen
    • Other Preservative
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Immunohistochemistry
    Morphology Light microscopy
    Morphology H-and-E microscopy
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Air-dried
    Ethanol
    Formalin (buffered)
    Snap frozen
    Immunohistochemistry Specific Type of antibody 1D5
    H222
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of tissue acquisition Surgical resection
    Fine needle aspiration

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...