NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield.

Author(s): Fleischhacker M, Schmidt B, Weickmann S, Fersching DM, Leszinski GS, Siegele B, Stötzer OJ, Nagel D, Holdenrieder S

Publication: Clin Chim Acta, 2011, Vol. 412, Page 2085-8

PubMed ID: 21861994 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of DNA isolation method, targeted gene, and prior specimen transport on cell-free DNA yields from plasma.

Conclusion of Paper

The average DNA yield was highest in specimens extracted using the MagNA Pure isolation system and lowest when extracted using QIAamp DNA blood Midi kit. Real time qPCR based DNA quantification was twice as high when Beta-globin was the targeted gene than when determined by amplification of Human endogenous virus (ERV) or Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). In general, the laboratory where the DNA was extracted had no effects on DNA yield, but significantly more DNA was extracted using the MagNA PURE isolation system in the untransported specimen compared to after mailing specimens from Berlin to the Munich site.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of isolation method, targeted gene and prior specimen transport the on quantification of cell-free DNA yields from plasma using real-time PCR. Plasma was obtained from pulmonary and oncology patients and stored at -80 degrees C in Berlin prior to the study. Plasma aliquots from each patient were thawed, pooled, and then realiquoted for shipping to Munich on dry ice or for additional storage in Berlin at -80 degrees C.

    Summary of Findings:

    The average DNA yield was 2-3 times higher in specimens extracted using the MagNA Pure isolation system than those extracted using NucleoSpin kit (p<0.0001), and average yields were 5-10 times higher using MagNA Pure than using QIAamp DNA blood Midi kit (p<0.0001). Real time qPCR based DNA quantification was twice as high when Beta-globin was the targeted gene than when determined by amplification of ERV or GAPDH (both p<0.001). Mailed specimens had decreased DNA yields when extracted using the MagNA PURE isolation system, and consequently, the Munich laboratory had smaller yields than the Berlin site using MagNA PURE, but not the other kits. (p=0.0126). The authors report higher DNA yields from cancer patients than from healthy controls, regardless of extraction method.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Benign
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    • Neoplastic - Lymphoma
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Real-time qPCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Storage Between site transportation method Mailed
    Not transported
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method QIAamp DNA blood Midi kit
    NucleoSpin kit
    MagNA Pure isolation system
    Real-time qPCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid ERV
    Beta-globin
    GAPDH

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...