NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Selection of an optimal method for co-isolation of circulating DNA and miRNA from the plasma of pregnant women.

Author(s): Sedlackova T, Repiska G, Minarik G

Publication: Clin Chem Lab Med, 2014, Vol. 52, Page 1543-8

PubMed ID: 24815052 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine if circulating DNA and microRNA (miRNA) could be co-isolated from the plasma of pregnant women.

Conclusion of Paper

Co-isolation of total circulating DNA (tcDNA), cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) and miRNA was successful using all three methods. While slightly more tcDNA (1.3-2.1 fold) and cffDNA (1.3-2.2 fold) were obtained when the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid (CNA) Kit with the DNA protocol was used, much higher yields of miR-16 (41-2448 fold) and miR-451  (50-2228 fold) were obtained using the miRcury kit rather than the other kits.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of isolation method on the yield of tcDNA, cffDNA and miRNA from the plasma of pregnant women. Blood from 10 pregnant women carrying male fetuses was collected into K2EDTA tubes and stored at 4°C for <24h before centrifugation. Plasma was aliquoted and stored at -20°C. The vacuum step in the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit protocols was replaced with centrifugation at 2200 g for 1 min. All isolated circulating DNA and miRNA was stored at -80°C. tcDNA was quantified by TaqMan  amplification of the androgen receptor (AR) gene, and cffDNA was quantified through TaqMan amplification of the Y chromosomal marker DYS14. miRNA was quantified using miScript reverse transcription and amplification assays. Variability between replicates was investigated using 10 additional EDTA-plasma specimens.

    Summary of Findings:

    tcDNA, cffDNA and miRNA were successfully isolated using all three methods. When the QIAamp CNA Kit with the DNA protocol was used, yields of tcDNA were 1.3-fold and 2.1-fold higher and yields of cffDNA were 1.3 and 2.2-fold higher than when isolated using the QIAamp CNA kit with the RNA protocol or the miRcury kit, respectively. Importantly, only the increased cffDNA yield using the QIAamp CNA Kit with the DNA protocol rather than the miRcury kit was significant (p=0.0449). In contrast, the yields of miR-16 and miR-451 were 41 and 50-fold higher, respectively when isolated using the miRcury kit rather than the QIAamp CNA kit with the RNA protocol (p<0.0001, both). The same two miRNAs were 2448 and 2228-fold higher, respectively, using the miRcury kit rather than the QIAamp CNA kit with the DNA protocol (p<0.0001, both). When co-isolated using the miRcury kit, technical replicates displayed <1% variability in tcDNA and cffDNA quantification and <2% variability in miRNA quantification.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Pregnant
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    DNA Real-time qPCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method miRCURY RNA Isolation Kit
    QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit using a modification of the miRNA protocol
    QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit using a modification of the circulating DNA protocol
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid miR-16
    miR-451
    Real-time qPCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid AR
    DYS14

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...