NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Strategies of reducing input sample volume for extracting circulating cell-free nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA in plasma.

Author(s): Chen W, Cai F, Zhang B, Zhong XY

Publication: Clin Chem Lab Med, 2012, Vol. 50, Page 261-5

PubMed ID: 22040238 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of DNA extraction method on the quantity and quality of circulating cell-free (ccf) DNA obtained from plasma.

Conclusion of Paper

Although lower 260/280 ratios were obtained using the phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol (PCI) method for extraction, higher concentrations and more genome equivalents (GE) of nuclear (n) DNA and mitochondrial (mt) DNA were obtained using this method than using the High Pure kit. Further, the PCI extraction method and High Pure kit yielded DNA samples in which nDNA and mtDNA were detected 100% of the time, while 25% of the DNA samples obtained by the single cell PCR method had undetectable nDNA.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of DNA extraction method on the quantity and quality of ccf DNA, including nDNA and mtDNA, obtained from plasma. K3EDTA-plasma was stored at -80 degrees C prior to analysis. Ccf DNA obtained by the single cell PCR method was not evaluated by nanodrop, but amplified directly by real-time qPCR.

    Summary of Findings:

    The 260/280 ratio of DNA extracted by the PCI method was lower than that of DNA extracted by the High Pure kit, however, the PCI method yielded a higher DNA concentration after DNA extracted from 50 uL of plasma was dissolved in 12.5 uL tris-EDTA buffer compared to the High Pure kit which extracted DNA from 200 uL of plasma and required 50 uL tris-EDTA buffer for column washing. Both nDNA and mtDNA were detected using each of these two extraction methods. Using the protocol for single cell PCR (5 uL of plasma), mtDNA was detected in all samples, while nDNA was only detected in 75% of single cell PCR samples. The GE of nDNA and mtDNA were 5.5-fold and 2-fold higher, respectively, when DNA was extracted by the PCI method than by the High Pure kit, although this was not statistically significant. Further, the cycle threshold (Ct) values for mtDNA extracted by PCI were lower than the Ct values using DNA extracted by the High Pure kit.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Spectrophotometry
    DNA Real-time qPCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method PCI
    High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit
    Single cell PCR method
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 5 uL
    50 uL
    200 uL
    Real-time qPCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid GAPDH
    Mitochondrial MTATP 8

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...