NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Collection of Genomic DNA from Adults in Epidemiological Studies by Buccal Cytobrush and Mouthwash

Author(s): Garcia-Closas M, Egan K, Abruzzo J, Newcomb P, Titus-Ernstoff L, Franklin T, Bender P, Beck J, Le Marchand L, Lum A, Alavanja M, Hayes RB, Rutter J, Buetow KH, Brinton L, Rothman N

Publication: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2001, Vol. 10, Page 687

PubMed ID: 11401920 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare genomic DNA quantity, quality, and genetic marker preservation among buccal specimens collected using either a cytobrush or alcohol-containing mouthwash. Several DNA extraction protocols were also compared.

Conclusion of Paper

Both cytobrush and mouthwash methods of genomic DNA self-collection yielded sufficient DNA for PCR-based assays, although a single mouthwash sample contained greater amounts of high molecular weight DNA than two cytobrush samples. DNA integrity and yield were superior following extraction with phenol-chloroform or the Puregene kit compared to extraction using NaOH or the QIAamp blood kit.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    To compare cytobrush samples sent by mail at room temperature without a transport medium with alcohol-based mouthwash samples sent by mail at room temperature for self-collection of buccal cells in terms of total human DNA yield, DNA integrity, and PCR success in amplifying beta-actin gene fragments.

    Summary of Findings:

    Total and human DNA yields from cytobrush samples were substantially lower than yields from mouthwash samples. In addition, cytobrush and mouthwash samples contain a mixture of DNA of human and nonhuman origin, and the amount of human DNA was higher in the mouthwash samples.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Electrophoresis
    DNA PCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of fluid acquisition Cytological brush
    Swishing
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of cell acquisition Cytological brush
    Swishing
  2. Study Purpose

    To compare phenol-chloroform DNA extraction to QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, Puregene DNA Isolation Kit, and NaOH extraction in terms of total human DNA yield, DNA integrity, and PCR success in amplifying beta-actin gene fragments.

    Summary of Findings:

    Total and human DNA yields from cytobrush or mouthwash samples extracted by the QIAamp blood kit (Qiagen Inc.) were lower than the yields obtained by a phenol-chloroform extraction method. In addition, QIAamp DNA extracts were of lower molecular weight than phenol-chloroform extracts. NaOH-extracted DNA was of low molecular weight and presented difficulties for PCR amplification of beta-globin gene fragments. Total and human DNA yields as well as DNA integrity, PCR success rates, and number of attempts for a successful amplification were very similar for mouthwash samples extracted by Puregene or by phenol-chloroform.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA DNA sequencing
    DNA PCR
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method Phenol-chloroform
    QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit
    Puregene DNA Isolation Kit
    NaOH extraction

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...