NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast carcinomas: comparison on cell block, needle-core, and tissue block preparations.

Author(s): Hanley KZ, Birdsong GG, Cohen C, Siddiqui MT

Publication: Cancer Cytopathol, 2009, Vol. 117, Page 279-88

PubMed ID: 19551847 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and HER2 expression between differently fixed and prepared breast cancer specimens.

Conclusion of Paper

Ethanol fixation of cell block (CB) preparations did not significantly affect ER status, however PR status and HER2 status were affected when compared with results from formalin-fixed needle-core (NC) and tissue block (TB) preparations. The authors conclude that ethanol fixation may affect tumor cell antigenicity and CB preparations of breast carcinoma are not reliable for determination of HER2 or PR status.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    ER, PR, and HER2 expression levels were compared between ethanol-fixed cell block (CB) preparations, and formalin-fixed tissue block (TB) and needle core (NC) preparations of 41 primary or metastatic breast carcinomas.

    Summary of Findings:

    The results of ER status showed a high degree of correlation between CB and NC preparations (87.8% concordance) as well as between TB and NC preparations (95.2% concordance). However, there were 5 cases where TB and NC specimens were positive for ER while the corresponding CB specimen was negative. Poor agreement was observed between CB and NC preparations with respect to PR status (73.2% concordance) with CB yielding a significant number of false negative results, if NC is taken as the standard. In fact, in 4 cases, the CB specimen was negative for ER and PR while NC and TB specimens were positive for both, indicating that ethanol fixation may affect tumor cell antigenicity. At the same time, TB and NC preparations showed a concordance rate of 92.7% with respect to PR status. HER2 status by IHC resulted in 85.4% concordance between CB and NC and 92.7% concordance between TB and NC. When HER2 status was determined by FISH analysis, no amplification was observed in 9/12 IHC false positive (3+ or 2+) results for CB specimens.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Ethanol
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Immunohistochemistry
    DNA FISH
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Ethanol
    Formalin (buffered)
    Immunohistochemistry Specific Targeted peptide/protein ER
    PR
    HER2
    FISH Specific Targeted nucleic acid HER2
    FISH Specific Technology platform FISH
    Immunohistochemistry
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of tissue acquisition Core needle biopsy
    Fine needle aspiration
    Surgical resection

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...