Histomorphologic Assessment of Formalin Substitute Fixatives for Diagnostic Surgical Pathology
Author(s): Titford ME, Horenstein MG
Publication: Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2005, Vol. 129, Page 502
PubMed ID: 15794674 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
Conclusion of Paper
Studies
-
Study Purpose
To assess histomorphology after fixation with formalin and five formalin substitutes seven different surgical pathological tissues were evaluated: hepatocellular carcinoma, ovarian sex cord/stromal tumor, myxoid liposarcoma, uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma, splenic follicular hyperplasia, infiltrating mammary carcinoma, and cecal signet ring carcinoma. Coded FFPE slides of each tumor were evaluated by four surgical pathologists in this blind study for the following histomorphologic parameters: cellular outlines, cytoplasmic detail, nuclear detail, erythrocyte integrity, lymphocyte integrity, overall morphology, and overall staining.
Summary of Findings:
While formalin fixation was paramount for overall morphology and staining, preservation of cellular outline, and erthrocyte integrity, nuclear features and lymphocyte detail were better preserved with Glyco-Fixx, and cytoplasmic detail was superior in Omnifix II fixed tissue.
Biospecimens
- Tissue - Liver
- Tissue - Uterus
- Tissue - Ovary
- Tissue - Spleen
- Tissue - Breast
- Tissue - Colorectal
- Tissue - Adipose
Preservative Types
- Formalin
- Other Preservative
Diagnoses:
- Neoplastic - Carcinoma
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform Morphology H-and-E microscopy Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Glyo-Fixx
STF
Omnifix II
Histochoice
Histofix
Formalin (buffered)