NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Interference of O.C.T. embedding compound with hormone receptor assays.

Author(s): Muensch H, Maslow WC

Publication: Am J Clin Pathol, 1984, Vol. 82, Page 89-92

PubMed ID: 6741878 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine if OCT embedding compound interferes with the dextran-charcoal method of assessing estrogen and progesterone receptor binding.

Conclusion of Paper

Although statistical significance was not assessed and between patient variability was high, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) binding were reduced in all 22 breast tumor biopsies embedded in OCT prior to snap-freezing compared to un-embedded case-matched controls. The magnitude of difference in maximum binding potential (mean Bmax values) was greater for PR (OCT-embedded=10.6 fmol/mg, un-embedded control=109.6 fmol/mg) than ER (OCT-embedded=141.2 fmol/mg, un-embedded control=173.5 fmol/mg). OCT compound also induced an artifactual increase in color formation during the Lowry protein assay, as albumin standards that contained 4% OCT had a 20-25% higher absorption than those that did not.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine if OCT embedding compound can interfere with the receptor binding assays for ER and PR. ER and PR binding was quantified by the dextran charcoal method. Breast tumor specimens were divided and embedded in OCT or left untreated before being snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 degrees C until analysis.

    Summary of Findings:

    Although statistical significance was not assessed and between patient variability was high, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) binding were reduced in all 22 breast tumor biopsies embedded in OCT prior to snap-freezing compared to un-embedded case-matched controls. The magnitude of difference in mean Bmax values was greater for PR (OCT-embedded=10.6 fmol/mg , un-embedded control=109.6 fmol/mg) than ER (OCT-embedded=141.2 fmol/mg, un-embedded control=173.5 fmol/mg). OCT compound also induced an artifactual increase in color formation during the Lowry protein assay, as albumin standards that contained 4% OCT had a 20-25% higher absorption than those that did not.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • OCT
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Receptor binding
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Snap frozen
    OCT
    Receptor binding Specific Targeted peptide/protein ER
    PR

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...