NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Prognostic markers in breast cancer: the reliability of HER2/neu status in core needle biopsy of 325 patients with primary breast cancer.

Author(s): Taucher S, Rudas M, Mader RM, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Roka S, Bachleitner T, Kandioler D, Steger G, Mittlböck M, Jakesz R

Publication: Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2004, Vol. 116, Page 26-31

PubMed ID: 15030120 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of using core needle biopsies (CNB) versus surgical excisions (SE) to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.

Conclusion of Paper

Overall accuracy of HER2 status determination in CNB was 92%, while sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 95%, respectively, compared with HER2 status determination in SE. The authors report no differences in the accuracy of HER2 status between patients who received chemotherapy between CNB and SE acquisition and those that did not.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using CNB versus SE to assess HER2 status by IHC staining. Contrary to other studies, the authors determined HER2 positive cases to be only those scoring a 3+ using the HercepTest, while those scoring a 0, 1+, or 2+ were deemed to be HER2 negative. CNB that were HER2 positive by IHC staining (3+), but HER2 negative with the SE were also evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Both CNB and SE were fixed in 4.5% neutral buffered formalin. The median length of time between CNB and SE acquisition was 25 days.

    Summary of Findings:

    Overall accuracy of HER2 status determination in CNB was 92%, while sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 95%, respectively. While 57 of 312 CNB specimens were determined to be HER2 positive, only 44 of the corresponding SE specimens were also HER2 positive. The remaining 13 SE were HER2 0, 1+, or 2+. FISH analysis agreed with the negative HER2 status determined for the SE in 11 of 13 cases. 10 of the 255 CNB determined to be HER2 negative had corresponding SE that were HER2 positive. The authors state that crushing CNB at the edge led to more intense staining and edge artifacts. The authors report no differences in the accuracy of HER2 status determination between patients who received chemotherapy between CNB and SE acquisition and those that did not.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Immunohistochemistry
    DNA FISH
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Immunohistochemistry Specific Technology platform FISH
    Preaquisition Other drugs Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    No chemotherapy
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of tissue acquisition Core needle biopsy
    Surgical resection

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...