Assessment of the influence of citrate concentration on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) determined with twelve reagent-instrument combinations.
Author(s): Chantarangkul V, Tripodi A, Clerici M, Negri B, Mannucci PM
Publication: Thromb Haemost, 1998, Vol. 80, Page 258-62
PubMed ID: 9716149 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
Conclusion of Paper
Studies
-
Study Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of trisodium citrate concentration and instrument/reagent combination on PT in plasma specimens from normal volunteers and patients on oral anticoagulant therapy.
Summary of Findings:
Mean PTs were longer for specimens collected in tubes containing 129 mM citrate compared to those collected in tubes containing 105 mM citrate, regardless of instrument, thromboplastin reagent, or whether the specimen was from a healthy volunteer or a patient on oral anticoagulant therapy, although the range of percentage differences was larger for patients on oral anticoagulant therapy than healthy volunteers. There were significant differences in the PT ratios (patient PT/mean PT of 20 normal volunteers) between the two citrate concentrations for the following instrument/reagent combinations: manual/Innovin, manual/PT HS, ACL 300R/ Recombiplastin, ACL 300R/Innovin, ACL 300R/PT HS, Koagulab/Neoplastin plus, Koagulab/Innovin, and Koagulab/PT HS. The other instrument/reagent combinations did not result in significant differences in PT ratios between the two citrate concentrations. For the BCT/441 reagent used only with the manual tilt tube technique, the ISI was not significantly influenced by citrate concentration, however, for the other 4 reagents, ISI values were greater when calibration was done using specimens collected in 105 mM citrate rather than 129 mM citrate, and the largest differences were observed for Innovin and PT HS, regardless of technique/instrument. Using the inappropriate ISI value to calculate INR values (i.e. ISI-105 to calculate INR-129) rather than the appropriate ISI led to significantly different INR values, which were clinically significant for specimens with an INR of 4.5 for all instrument/reagent combinations tested. Further, the effects of citrate concentration were even more pronounced if the ISI generated with the manual technique was used to determine INR values using the 4 instruments.
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- None (Fresh)
Diagnoses:
- Normal
- Not specified
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform Morphology Hematology/ auto analyzer Morphology Macroscopic observation Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Preaquisition Other drugs None
Oral anticoagulant therapy
Hematology/ auto analyzer Specific Technology platform Manual tilt tube technique
ACL 300R
Koagulab Chromo
Hematology/ auto analyzer Specific Reaction solution Recombiplastin
Neoplastin plus
Innovin
PT HS
Macroscopic observation Specific Reaction solution BCT/441
Recombiplastin
Neoplastin plus
Innovin
PT HS
Biospecimen Acquisition Anticoagulant Sodium citrate
Multiple concentrations evaluated