NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Comparison of Methodologies to Detect Low Levels of Hemolysis in Serum for Accurate Assessment of Serum microRNAs.

Author(s): Shah JS, Soon PS, Marsh DJ

Publication: PLoS One, 2016, Vol. 11, Page e0153200

PubMed ID: 27054342 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to compare four different methods of detecting hemolysis (visually, spectrophotometer, clinical chemistry analyzer, qPCR) and to determine if levels of microRNAs (miRNA, miR) determined to be sensitive to hemolysis differ between hemolysed serum samples.

Conclusion of Paper

The sensitivity of hemolysis detection assays was method dependent, with the lowest levels of hemolysis (0.001%) detectable only by real-time PCR.  The authors concluded that visual inspection is only accurate when hemolysis is severe given that specimens with the lowest detectable level of hemolysis when assessed visually had an absorbance at 414 nm and a miR-451 to miR-23a-3p ratio (by real-time PCR) that indicated hemolysis was severe. Absorbance at 414 nm was comparable in specimens classified as having low and moderate hemolysis based on real-time PCR ratios but significantly higher in serum that was severely hemolyzed. Nevertheless, specimens with low hemolysis based on real-time PCR results (ratio of miR-451a to miR-23a-3p <5) were detected by spectrophotometry with a sensitivity of 25% but a specificity of 96.6% when an absorbance threshold of 0.072 at 414 nm was applied. Levels of miR-16-5p and miR-15b-3p were increased with increased hemolysis category based on real-time PCR ratios.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to compare four different methods of detecting hemolysis and to determine if levels of hemolysis-sensitive microRNAs (miRNA, miR) differ between serum spiked with different dilutions of hemolysate. Hemolysate was prepared by sonication of a clotted blood specimen collected from a healthy woman. A hemolysis dilution series was prepared by dilution of the hemolysate in serum to achieve 100%, 20%, 4%, 1%, 0.25%, 0.062%, 0.016%, 0.004% and 0.001% hemolyzed serum.  RNA was extracted using the miRCURY RNA Isolation kit. Hemolysis was assessed using the Coulter1AcT diff Analyzer and the Tainer Reagent Kit, visually, by absorbance at 414 nm using a spectrophotometer, and by real-time PCR amplification of miR-451a and miR-23a-3p. Additional blood was collected from 56 women with high grade serous ovarian cancer and 30 age-matched healthy women. Blood collection was via 21-gauge needle or from the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line). Blood was allowed to clot for 15-30 min at 4°C before separation of serum by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C.  

    Summary of Findings:

    The sensitivity of hemolysis detection assays was measured by serial dilution using isolated hemolysate and was determined to be method dependent, with the lowest levels of hemolysis (0.001%) detectable only by real-time PCR. Conversely, spectrophotometry could detect ≥0.004% hemolysate, visual inspection detected hemolysis at ≥ 0.025% hemolysate, while the Coulter1AcT diff Analyzer detected hemolysis at ≥1% hemolysate. Using the miRNA ratio of real-time PCR amplicons (miR-451a to miR-23a-3p), 16%, 48% and 36% of the specimens were classified as having low (ratio of miR-451a to miR-23a-3p <5), moderate (5< ratio < 7), or severe (ratio > 7) hemolysis.  Visual inspection proved to be accurate only when hemolysis was severe, as specimens with the lowest visually detectable level of hemolysis had an elevated absorbance value at 414 nm and a miR-451 to miR-23a-3p ratio of 7.67 (by real-time PCR), both of which indicated hemolysis was severe. The absorbance at 414 nm was comparable in specimens classified as having low and moderate hemolysis based on real-time PCR ratio but the absorbance was 1.855-fold higher in specimens that were severely hemolyzed (P<0.001, both). Nevertheless, specimens with low hemolysis based on real-time PCR results (ratio of miR-451a to miR-23a-3p <5) were detected by spectrophotometry with a sensitivity of 25% but a specificity of 96.6% when an absorbance threshold of 0.072 at 414 nm was applied. Levels of miR-16-5p and miR-15b-3p were 5.9-fold and 4.5-fold higher, respectively, in specimens with severe hemolysis than those with low hemolysis (P<0.0001) based on the real-time PCR ratio (miR-451a to miR-23a-3p) and approximately 2-fold higher in specimens with moderate hemolysis than low hemolysis.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein Spectrophotometry
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    Protein Macroscopic observation
    Protein Clinical chemistry/auto analyzer
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid miR-451a
    miR-23a-3p
    miR-16-5p
    miR-15-3p
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Technology platform Spectrophotometer
    Coulter1AcT diff Analyzer and the Tainer Reagent Kit
    Real-time PCR of miR-451a to miR-23a-3p
    Visual

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...