NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Copy number and loss of heterozygosity detected by SNP array of formalin-fixed tissues using whole-genome amplification.

Author(s): Stokes A, Drozdov I, Guerra E, Ouzounis CA, Warnakulasuriya S, Gleeson MJ, McGurk M, Tavassoli M, Odell EW

Publication: PLoS One, 2011, Vol. 6, Page e24503

PubMed ID: 21966361 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of whole genome amplification (WGA) of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens on copy number and loss of heterozyygosity (LOH) determination using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays.

Conclusion of Paper

Call rates were similar for unamplified and WGA DNA from FFPE specimens, and 56.1% of the SNPs that failed using WGA DNA also failed using unamplified DNA, but there were 2.3% less failed calls for the homozygous AA SNPs using WGA DNA. Of the 76.5% of SNPs that produced calls using WGA and unamplified DNA, 82.4% produced concordant calls with WGA and unamplified DNA. When copy number changes were identified using both WGA and unamplified DNA the direction was concordant 99.5% of the time, but a large percentage of copy number changes and LOH were found only using one or the other type of DNA.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of WGA of DNA from FFPE normal and dysplastic oral epithelium on copy number and LOH determination using SNP microarrays. Specimens were stored 3-12 years prior to DNA extraction and experimentation.

    Summary of Findings:

    Call rates were similar for unamplified and WGA DNA from FFPE specimens (90.1% and 89.8%, respectively), but these rates decreased to 84.1% and 82.8%, respectively, when only SNPs on fragments less than 350 bp were considered. Homozygous and heterozygous call rates were similar for WGA and unamplified DNA. 56.1% of the SNPs that failed using WGA DNA also failed using unamplified DNA, but there were 2.3% less failed calls for the homozygous AA SNPs using WGA DNA indicating a bias in amplification. 76.5% of SNPs produced calls using WGA and unamplified DNA with an 82.4% concordance in calls between the two types. When copy number changes were identified using both WGA and unamplified DNA, the direction was concordant 99.5% of the time, but 50.25% of the copy number changes identified using unamplified DNA were not identified using WGA DNA with more amplifications missed than deletions. Further, 36.4% of copy number changes identified using WGA DNA were not found using unamplified DNA. 73.5% of LOH instances found in unamplified DNA were not found using WGA DNA, and 74.49% of identified LOH instances using WGA DNA were not found with unamplified DNA. Chromosomal location was not found to have any effects on LOH.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    • Other diagnoses
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Array CGH
    DNA DNA microarray
    DNA Whole genome amplification
    DNA SNP assay
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Preaquisition Diagnosis/ patient condition Dysplastic
    Whole genome amplification Specific Nucleic acid amplification None
    Amplified with OmniPlex

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...