NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Frozen section analysis of margins for head and neck tumor resections: reduction of sampling errors with a third histologic level.

Author(s): Olson SM, Hussaini M, Lewis JS Jr

Publication: Mod Pathol, 2011, Vol. 24, Page 665-70

PubMed ID: 21217647 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of analyzing 3 rather than 2 frozen section margins intra-operatively to determine whether complete resection of tumor was achieved.

Conclusion of Paper

When specimens for which no tumor or dysplasia was identified on the frozen sections or the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) section were excluded from analysis, overall and sampling error rates for two-level sectioning were significantly higher than three-level sectioning error rates, but interpretation error rates were not different. A significantly higher percentage of margins were found to harbor tumor in the frozen sections during the period when 3 sections were analyzed compared to during the period when 2 sections were analyzed. Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma was the only tumor subtype examined that showed a significant increase in positive margin sampling error rates between two-level sectioning and three-level sectioning.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of analyzing 3 rather than 2 frozen section margins intra-operatively to determine whether complete resection of tumor was achieved.

    Summary of Findings:

    When two frozen section margins were analyzed intra-operatively, the sampling and interpretation error rates were 1.6% and 0.8%, respectively for a combined error rate of 2.4%. When an additional third frozen section margin from a deeper level was examined, the sampling and interpretation error rates were 1.2% and 1.3%, respectively (2.5% overall), and were not significantly different from the two-level sectioning analysis. However, when specimens for which no tumor or dysplasia was identified on the frozen sections or an FFPE section were excluded, two-level sectioning error rates were significantly higher than three-level sectioning error rates, for both overall rates (22.9% versus 15.2%, p=0.03) and sampling error rates (15.3% versus 7.4%, p=0.006), but not for interpretation error rates (7.6% versus 7.8%, p=1.0). A significantly higher percentage of margins were found to harbor tumor in the frozen sections during the period when 3 section were analyzed (16.7%) compared to during the period when 2 sections were analyzed (10.5%, p<0.0001). Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma was the only tumor subtype examined that showed a significant increase in positive margin sampling error rates between two-level sectioning and three-level sectioning.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    • Neoplastic - Benign
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Morphology Light microscopy
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 2 frozen sections and 1 paraffin section examined
    3 frozen sections and 1 paraffin section examined
    Preaquisition Diagnosis/ patient condition Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma
    Non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma
    Other tumors

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...