Hemolysis of coagulation specimens: a comparative study of intravenous draw methods.
Author(s): Stauss M, Sherman B, Pugh L, Parone D, Looby-Rodriguez K, Bell A, Reed CR
Publication: J Emerg Nurs, 2012, Vol. 38, Page 15-21
PubMed ID: 22226132 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
Conclusion of Paper
Studies
-
Study Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using extension tubing connected to an IV catheter during blood collection and patient anticoagulant therapy on hemolysis rates among coagulation specimens.
Summary of Findings:
While some patients in this study were on anticoagulant therapy and others were not, there was no significant difference in rates of hemolysis between specimens from the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the rates of hemolysis (>0 mg/dL) between specimens collected with the use of extension tubing (33%) and without the use of extension tubing (33%).
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- None (Fresh)
Diagnoses:
- Not specified
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform Morphology Macroscopic observation Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Preaquisition Other drugs Anticoagulant therapy
No anticoagulant therapy
Biospecimen Acquisition Cannulation Extension tubing
No extension tubing