Reliance on hormone receptor assays of surgical specimens may compromise outcome in patients with breast cancer
Author(s): Mann B, Fahey VD, Feleppa F, Buchanan MR
Publication: J Clin Oncol, 2005, Vol. 23, Page 5148
PubMed ID: 16051956 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
Conclusion of Paper
Studies
-
Study Purpose
The purpose of this paper was to compare IHC staining of ER, PR and HER-2 in surgical and core biopsy breast cancer specimens.
Summary of Findings:
Concordance between staining of surgical and core specimens occurred 86% of the time for ER, 83% of the time for PR and 80% of the time for HER-2. Much of the discordance was attributed to core specimens exhibiting positive staining for ER, PR, and HER-2 while surgical specimens were negative 13%, 11%, and 1% of the time, respectively. Furthermore, in 17% of cases, the core was equivocal for HER-2 staining while the surgical specimen was negative. The authors believe that the false-negatives obtained from surgical specimens are likely attributable to fixation problems. In conclusion, the use of surgical specimens may produce false negatives for hormone receptor status IHC staining of breast cancers.
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- Formalin
Diagnoses:
- Neoplastic - Carcinoma
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform Protein Immunohistochemistry Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Biospecimen Acquisition Method of tissue acquisition Core needle biopsy
Surgical resection
