NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Evaluation of factors influencing accuracy in the analysis of succinylacetone in dried blood spots.

Author(s): Peng M, Liu L, Peng L

Publication: Clin Chim Acta, 2012, Vol. 413, Page 1265-9

PubMed ID: 22522056 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of specimen volume, hematocrit level, and location of the punch on succinylacetone (SUAC) analysis of spiked dried blood spots (DBS) by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Conclusion of Paper

Increasing hematocrit values led to higher measured SUAC concentrations in DBS by LC-MS/MS, regardless of spiked SUAC concentration. Larger bias was observed as the difference in hematocrit level between the calibrator (50% hematocrit) and the specimen increased. Measured SUAC concentration increased with increasing volumes of blood spotted into filter paper. The authors state that punch location within the DBS had no effect on measured SUAC concentration.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of specimen volume, hematocrit level, and location of the DBS punch on LC-MS/MS quantification of spiked SUAC. Specified amounts of plasma were added back to washed cells (collected in citrate phosphate dextrose adenine anticoagulant) from a single donor to obtain the desired hematocrit level. These blood specimens were then spiked with SUAC, and different volumes were spotted on filter paper, dried overnight at room temperature, and stored in sealed bags with desiccant at -40 degrees C. The calibration and QC specimens (hematocrit 50%) were used for analysis the next day (no frozen storage).

    Summary of Findings:

    Increasing hematocrit values led to higher measured SUAC concentrations in DBS by LC-MS/MS, regardless of the original spiked SUAC concentration. Larger bias was observed as the difference in hematocrit level between the calibrator (50% hematocrit) and the specimen increased. For specimens spiked with 5.96 umol/L SUAC, those with a hematocrit level of 30% had a bias of -45% while specimens with hematocrit levels of 40%, 50%, and 60% had biases of -11.7%, 7.7%, and 23.8%. Measured SUAC concentration increased with increasing volumes of blood spotted into filter paper. With blood volumes of 70-100 uL, biases of 20-37% were observed compared to the 50 uL calibration specimens. Blood volumes of 10-50 uL resulted in biases of <13%. The authors state that punches taken from 5 different locations on the DBS had a coefficient of variation (CV) of 2.14% representing a negligible chromatographic effect.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Other Preservative
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Small molecule LC-MS or LC-MS/MS
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot size/volume 10 uL
    30 uL
    50 uL
    70 uL
    100 uL
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Biospecimen components 30% hematocrit
    40% hematocrit
    50% hematocrit
    60% hematocrit
    5.99 umol/L SUAC
    148.60 umol/L SUAC
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Biospecimen heterogeneity Dried blood spot sub-sampling (exact positions not specified)

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...