NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Lack of consistency between two commercial ELISAs and against an in-house ELISA for the detection of CD36 in human plasma.

Author(s): Lykkeboe S, Larsen AL, Handberg A

Publication: Clin Chem Lab Med, 2012, Vol. 50, Page 1071-4

PubMed ID: 22706248 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of centrifugation speed, freeze-thaw cycling, and ELISA manufacturer on the quantification of thrombospondin receptor (CD36) in EDTA-plasma.

Conclusion of Paper

CD36 levels, as measured by each of the three assays, were strongly or very strongly correlated between specimens centrifuged at 1000 x g and those centrifuged at 1850 x g. Further, CD36 levels were strongly correlated between fresh specimens and those subjected to 3 freeze-thaw cycles for each of the three assays. However, CD36 levels were not correlated between the assays, and levels differed by 2 to more than 1000 fold between ELISA methods.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of centrifugation speed (1000 x g versus 1850 x g), freeze-thaw cycling, and ELISA manufacturer on the quantification of CD36 in EDTA-plasma. The in-house protocol required 3 freeze-thaw cycles.

    Summary of Findings:

    CD36 levels in specimens centrifuged at 1000 x g and 1850 x g were very strongly correlated when measured by the Adipobioscience ELISA (r=0.99, p<0.001) and strongly correlated using the Cusabio Biotech (r=0.80, p=0.006) and in-house ELISAs (r=0.85, p=0.002). Further, CD36 levels in specimens subjected to 3 freeze-thaw cycles (in house ELISA) and those subjected to none were very strongly correlated when measured by the Adipobioscience ELISA (r=0.91, p<0.001) and strongly correlated using the Cusabio Biotech ELISA (r=0.81, p=0.004). However, CD36 levels determined by the three different ELISAs were not correlated with each other and differed by 2 to more than 1000 fold. Cusabio Biotech ELISA values were at the low end of the assay sensitivity making dilution not possible. The Adipobioscience ELISA had a higher than optimal background.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein ELISA
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    ELISA Specific Technology platform Cusabio Biotech
    Adipobioscience
    In house
    Storage Freeze/thaw cycling 0 cycles
    3 cycles
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Centrifugation Multiple speeds compared

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...