Multicenter Evaluation of Independent High-Throughput and RT-qPCR Technologies for the Development of Analytical Workflows for Circulating miRNA Analysis.
Author(s): Babayan A, Neumann MHD, Herdean A, Shaffer JM, Janning M, Kobus F, Loges S, Di Pasquale F, Kubista M, Schlumpberger M, Lampignano R, Krahn T, Schlange T, Sprenger-Haussels M, Pantel K, Kloten V
Publication: Cancers (Basel), 2020, Vol. 12, Page
PubMed ID: 32380788 PubMed Review Paper? No
Purpose of Paper
The purpose of this paper was to compare cell-free microRNA (cfmiRNA) and extracellular vesicle-derived microRNA (EVmiRNA) expression profiles obtained using next-generation sequencing (QIAseq) and two hybridization platforms (Nanostring and Toray 3D). Twenty-six miRNAs were selected for analysis of differential expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLCL) patient specimens using the aforementioned platforms and two real-time PCR platforms (miRCURY and two-tailed).
Conclusion of Paper
Both cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA read counts in plasma from healthy individuals and those with NSCLC were higher using QIAseq than nCounter and Nanostring. Compared to healthy controls, patients with NCSLC had higher levels of both cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA, but the magnitude of the differences depended on the platform used. Detection of 26 selected miRNAs was generally low using QIAseq, nCounter, and Nanostring and there was almost no overlap in miRNAs identified to be differentially expressed in NSCLC versus healthy controls and many miRNAs were not detected by one or more platforms. Using miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR differential expression in NSCLC versus healthy controls was found for 12 and six EVmiRNAs, respectively; five of which were common and five and seven cfmiRNAs, respectively; three of which were common. Importantly, the three cfmiRNAs which were found to be differentially expressed using miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR (miR-451a, miR-16-5p and miR-186-5p) were also differentially expressed in EVmiRNA using both platforms. Of these, miR-16-5p and miR-186-5p were also found to be differentially expressed in NSCLC versus control cfmiRNA using QIAseq but were not identified as significantly differentially expressed using the other platforms or in EVmiRNA. Further investigation showed only miR-16-5p to be upregulated >2 fold using both miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR platforms in both EVmiRNA and cfmiRNA.respectively of which 3 were common. Importantly the 3 cfmiRNA which were found to be differentially expressed using miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR, miR-451a, miR-16-5p and miR-186-5p were also differentially expressed in EVmiRNA using both platforms. Of these miR-16-5p and miR-186-5p were also found to be differentially expressed in NSCLC versus control cfmiRNA using QIAseq, but they were not identified as significantly differentially expressed using the other platforms or in EVmiRNA. Further investigation showed only miR-16-5p to be upregulated >2 fold using both miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR platforms in both EVmiRNA and cfmiRNA.
Studies
-
Study Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA expression profiles obtained using next-generation sequencing (QIAseq) and two hybridization platforms (Nanostring and Toray 3D). Twenty-six miRNAs were selected for analysis of differential expression in non-small cell lung cancer patient specimens using the aforementioned platforms and two real-time PCR platforms (miRCURY and two-tailed). Blood was collected from 27 patients with NCSLC and 20 healthy controls into K3EDTA S-Monovette tubes. Plasma was obtained within 2 h of collection by centrifugation at 2500 x g for 10 min followed by recentrifugation of the supernatant at 2500 x g for 10 min. Plasma was stored frozen at -80°C until extraction. Plasma was thawed in a 37°C water bath, vortexed, and cfmiRNA was extracted using the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Advanced and EVmiRNA was obtained using the ExoRNeasy Maxi Kit. Extracted cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA were stored frozen in 96 well plates at -80°C. Libraries were prepared using QIAseq miRNA Library Kit and used for next-generation sequencing. cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA were quantified using the nCounter Human v3 miRNA Panel and the Toray Human miRNA Microarray ver.21 chip. miRNA was reverse-transcribed using the miRCURY LNA RT Kit and 26 selected miRNAs were quantified using miRCURY LNA SYBR Green PCR Kit. Two-tailed qPCR was used to quantify the same 26 miRNAs after reverse-transcription using TATAA GrandScript cDNA FreePrime Kit using TATAA SYBR GenMaster Mix.
Summary of Findings:
The highest cfmiRNA and EVmiRNA read counts in plasma from healthy individuals and those with NSCLC were obtained using QIAseq followed by Toray 3D with the lowest read counts using Nanostring. The QIAseq read counts were significantly higher for EVmiRNA in patients with NSCLC than for cfmiRNA in healthy patients and those with NSCLC (P<0.001, both). The Nanosting read counts for cfmiRNA were significantly higher in NSCLC patients than healthy controls (P<0.05). Compared to healthy controls, patients with NCSLC had 15.9%, 142.1%, and 317.6% more cfmiRNA and 162.9%, 46.3%, and 163% more EVmiRNA using QIAseq, Toray 3D, and Nanostring; respectively.
Detection of 26 selected miRNAs was generally low, with only 15%, 35%, and 50% found in the EVmiRNA and 77%, 23%, and 31% in the cfmiRNA fractions using QIAseq, nCounter, and Nanostring; respectively. Differential expression of these 26 miRNAs between NSCLC patients and healthy controls occurred for 2 EVmiRNAs and 11 cfmiRNAs when using QIAseq, 3 EVmiRNAs and 1 cfmiRNAs using nCounter, and 1 EVmiRNA and 1 cfmiRNAs using Toray 3D. Of these significantly differentially expressed miRNAs, only one (miR-122-5p in cfmiRNA) was significant using multiple platforms (QIAseq and nCounter, not detected using Toray 3D). Validation using miRCURY and qPCR identified differential expression in NSCLC and healthy controls for 12 and six EVmiRNAs, respectively; of which five were common and five and seven cfmiRNAs, respectively; of which three were common. Importantly, the three cfmiRNAs which were found to be differentially expressed using miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR (miR-451a, miR-16-5p, and miR-186-5p) were also differentially expressed in EVmiRNA using both platforms. Of these, miR-16-5p and miR-186-5p were also found to be differentially expressed in NSCLC versus control cfmiRNA using QIAseq but were not identified as significantly differentially expressed using the other platforms or in EVmiRNA. Further investigation showed only miR-16-5p to be upregulated >2 fold using both miRCURY qPCR and two-tailed qPCR platforms in both EVmiRNA and cfmiRNA. Interestingly, miR-21-5p was found to be upregulated using qPCR but downregulated using miRCURY qPCR.
Biospecimens
Preservative Types
- Frozen
Diagnoses:
- Normal
- Neoplastic - Carcinoma
Platform:
Analyte Technology Platform RNA DNA microarray RNA Real-time qRT-PCR RNA Next generation sequencing Pre-analytical Factors:
Classification Pre-analytical Factor Value(s) Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Blood and blood products Plasma
Extracellular vesicles
Next generation sequencing Specific Technology platform Nanostring
Toray 3D array
Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Technology platform QIAseq NGS
Nanostring
Toray 3D array
miRCURY qPCR
Two-tailed qPCR
