NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Brand of dipotassium EDTA vacuum tube as a new source of pre-analytical variability in routine haematology testing.

Author(s): Lima-Oliveira G, Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Poli G, Solero GP, Picheth G, Guidi GC

Publication: Br J Biomed Sci, 2013, Vol. 70, Page 6-9

PubMed ID: 23617091 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of collection tube manufacturer on 16 hematological parameters in K2 EDTA blood.

Conclusion of Paper

The collection tube type (Venosafe, Vacuette, or Vacutainer) had significant effects on hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), white blood cell (WBC) count, and platelet distribution width (PDW), but all other hematological parameters were unaffected by collection tube type.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of collection tube manufacturer on 16 hematological parameters in K2 EDTA blood from healthy volunteers. Patients remained seated for 15 min before venipuncture and collection into a plain 2 mL tube (discarded), then the 3.0 mL Venosafe tube, the 4.0 mL Vacuette and finally the 3.0 mL Vacutainer. All three tubes used after the initial plain tube contained K2 EDTA, but at slightly different concentrations.

    Summary of Findings:

    The collection tube type had significant effects on hematocrit, MCV, WBC count, and PDW, but the other 12 hematological parameters were unaffected by collection tube type. Compared to specimens in Venosafe tubes, specimens in Vacuettes had higher hematocrit (p=0.04), MCV (p<0.01) and PDW (p<0.01) and lower WBC counts (p=0.03), but the authors state only the differences in HCT and PDW were clinically relevant. Compared to specimens in Venosafe tubes, specimens in Vacutainers had lower MCV (p<0.01) and WBC counts (p=0.03) and higher PDW (p<0.01), but the authors report only the difference in PDW was clinically relevant. Compared to specimens in Vacuettes, specimens in Vacutainers had lower hematocrit (p<0.01) and MCV (p<0.01), and all differences were reported to be clinically relevant. The authors state the differences may be attributed to differences in EDTA particle size, EDTA concentration or tube material, but do not discuss the potential impact of serial collection.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Cell count/volume Hematology/ auto analyzer
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Type of collection container/solution Venosafe
    Vacuette
    Vacutainer
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot sequential collection 2nd collection
    3rd collection
    4th collection

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...