NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Effect of 3.2% vs 3.8% sodium citrate concentration on routine coagulation testing.

Author(s): Adcock DM, Kressin DC, Marlar RA

Publication: Am J Clin Pathol, 1997, Vol. 107, Page 105-10

PubMed ID: 8980376 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of sodium citrate concentration and assay reagent on prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

Conclusion of Paper

Citrate concentration (3.2% versus 3.8%) affects PT and aPTT results for all patients and healthy volunteers when the responsive reagents Innovin and Actin FS are used in the assays and for patients on IV heparin when the nonresponsive reagents Thromboplastin C+ and Actin are used.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of sodium citrate concentration and assay reagent on PT and aPTT in plasma from healthy volunteers and patients on anticoagulant therapy.

    Summary of Findings:

    When the responsive reagents (Actin FS and Innovin) were used, the normal ranges of aPTT and PT increased when specimens from healthy volunteers were collected in 3.8% citrate compared to 3.2% citrate (both p<0.001). There was no significant difference in aPTT or PT ranges between specimens from healthy volunteers collected in 3.8 or 3.2% citrate when the nonresponsive reagents (Actin and Thromboplastin C+) were used in the assays. Specimens collected from all four treatment groups (no anticoagulant, IV heparin, oral anticoagulants, or both anticoagulant therapies) into 3.8% citrate had significantly higher PT values than those collected into 3.2% citrate with Innovin. When Thromboplastin C+ was used, only the IV heparin therapy treatment group had longer PT when collected in 3.8% rather than 3.2% citrate. Specimens collected from all four treatment groups into 3.8% citrate had significantly higher aPTT values than those collected into 3.2% citrate with Actin FS. When Actin was used, this was only true for patients on IV heparin therapy, with or without additional oral anticoagulants.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Morphology Hematology/ auto analyzer
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Hematology/ auto analyzer Specific Reaction solution Innovin
    Thromboplastin C+
    Actin FS
    Actin
    Biospecimen Acquisition Anticoagulant Sodium citrate
    Multiple concentrations evaluated
    Preaquisition Other drugs IV heparin
    IV heparin and oral anticoagulants
    Oral anticoagulants
    No anticoagulants

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...