NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Comparison of laboratory values obtained by phlebotomy versus saline lock devices.

Author(s): Corbo J, Fu L, Silver M, Atallah H, Bijur P

Publication: Acad Emerg Med, 2007, Vol. 14, Page 23-7

PubMed ID: 17099189 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of obtaining blood specimens through a saline lock device (SLD) as opposed to venipuncture on hematocrit, electrolytes, glucose, and cardiac enzyme levels.

Conclusion of Paper

The overall success rate of obtaining specimens from the SLD was 90.1%. No clotted or hemolyzed specimens were obtained using SLD or standard venipuncture for specimen collection. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean values of any of the tested analytes between the two collection methods.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of obtaining blood specimens through an SLD as opposed to venipuncture on hematocrit, electrolytes, glucose, and cardiac enzyme levels. The effects of catheter size on successful aspiration were also examined. SLD specimens were obtained within 5 minutes of venipuncture specimens, and the first 5 mL of blood obtained through the SLD was discarded.

    Summary of Findings:

    While the overall success rate of obtaining specimens from the SLD was 90.1%, there appeared to be a decline in success rates with increasing catheter gauge, however, sample size was highly varied among the catheter gauges analyzed, and some samples were too small for statistical analysis. No clotted or hemolyzed specimens were obtained using SLD or standard venipuncture for specimen collection. While there were no statistically significant differences in the mean values of any of the tested analytes (hematocrit, serum sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, glucose, creatine phosphokinase, and troponin I) between the two collection methods, 6.0% of the paired values analyzed exceeded the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and, with venipuncture taken as the standard, 7.4% of the values obtained from SLD specimens were outside the national recommended Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) range. Importantly, the authors state that none of the values exceeding Bland-Altman limits of agreement would have warranted clinical intervention.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Carbohydrate Clinical chemistry/auto analyzer
    Electrolyte/Metal Clinical chemistry/auto analyzer
    Small molecule Clinical chemistry/auto analyzer
    Protein Clinical chemistry/auto analyzer
    Cell count/volume Hematology/ auto analyzer
    Cell count/volume Macroscopic observation
    Morphology Macroscopic observation
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Cannulation 22-gauge catheter
    18-gauge catheter
    20-gauge catheter
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of fluid acquisition Venipuncture
    Saline lock device

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...