NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Different techniques for urinary protein analysis of normal and lung cancer patients.

Author(s): Tantipaiboonwong P, Sinchaikul S, Sriyam S, Phutrakul S, Chen S T

Publication: Proteomics, 2005, Vol. 5, Page 1140

PubMed ID: 15693063 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper performed a comparative assessment of urinary protein profiles for five urine purification methods using three analytical platforms in specimens collected from healthy and lung cancer patients.

Conclusion of Paper

The authors recommend sequential gel filtration and ultrafiltration purification for analysis of the urinary proteome. Differential protein expression patterns among healthy and lung cancer patients were observed with all analytical platforms, although differences were more distinct with two dimensional gel electrophoresis. Nine differentially expressed proteins were identified by mass spectrometry.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this paper was to compare the proteomics of urine prepared by gel filtration followed by ultrafiltration or one of four precipitation methods using three analytical platforms: high-performance liquid chromatography, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis.

    Summary of Findings:

    Urine purification via ultrafiltration, acetone or ACN/TFA precipitation yielded similar results, while methanol/chloroform/water and TC/acetone precipitation yielded fewer protein peaks, as determined by RP-HPLC. Urine specimens from healthy and lung cancer patients had distinct protein profiles. SDS-PAGE analysis of differentially prepared urine specimens yielded similar results, although diagnosis-specific differences in protein bands were observed. Results of 2-DE analysis were superior with samples purified by ultrafiltration. Urine specimens subjected to sequential gel filtration and ultrafiltration yielded a number of differentially expressed proteins smaller than 30 kDa among healthy and lung cancer patients; nine of these differentially expressed spots were identified via MS analysis.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Normal
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Protein 1D/2D gels
    Protein LC-MS or LC-MS/MS
    Protein MALDI-TOF MS
    Protein HPLC
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method Ultrafiltration
    Acetone precipitation
    Acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid precipitation
    Methanol/water/chloroform precipitation
    Trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation
    1D/2D gels Specific Technology platform SDS-PAGE
    2D gel

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...