NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

The effect of blood drawing techniques and equipment on the hemolysis of ED laboratory blood samples.

Author(s): Grant MS

Publication: J Emerg Nurs, 2003, Vol. 29, Page 116-21

PubMed ID: 12660692 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of phlebotomy technique on the degree of hemolysis in serum specimens.

Conclusion of Paper

Higher rates of hemolysis were observed when specimens were collected via new intravenous (IV) catheters versus straight needles, but IV catheter gauge did not significantly affect hemolysis rates. New IV catheter draws using a vacutainer had a significantly higher level of hemolysis than those collected using a syringe. High or gross levels of hemolysis were not observed in specimens that were drawn using a straight needle and either a vacutainer or syringe. The authors state that blood transfer method from a syringe (by needle directly to tube versus needleless connector to vacutainer and tube) had no effect on hemolysis rates.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of venipuncture technique (IV catheter versus straight needle), blood-draw method (vacutainer versus syringe), and blood-transfer method (needle to a tube versus needleless connector to a vacutainer and a tube) on the degree of hemolysis in serum specimens. The degree of hemolysis was determined by manual observation of serum color and graded on a 0-4 scale.

    Summary of Findings:

    144/454 (32%) of specimens had some degree of hemolysis (level 1-4). 13% of specimens had high or gross hemolysis (graded at a 3-4 level) and were inappropriate for scheduled tests. 20% of specimens collected via new IV catheters (1st collection) were hemolyzed at high or gross levels while 10% of specimens collected via existing IV catheters and 1% of the specimens collected via straight needle had similar levels of hemolysis. The difference in hemolysis rates between new IV catheters and straight needles was significant (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in hemolysis rates between specimens collected using the different IV catheter gauges. Hemolysis rates among specimens collected using straight needles were too low to assess the effects of needle gauge. The authors state that syringe size had no effect on hemolysis rates. New IV catheter draws using a vacutainer had a significantly higher level of hemolysis than those collected using a syringe (P=0.02). High or gross levels of hemolysis were not observed when specimens were drawn using a straight needle and either a vacutainer or syringe. The authors state that blood transfer method from a syringe (by needle directly to tube versus needleless connector to vacutainer and tube) had no effect on hemolysis rates.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • None (Fresh)
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    Cell count/volume Macroscopic observation
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Method of fluid acquisition Central venous catheter
    IV catheter
    Needle
    Needleless connector
    Syringe draw
    Venipuncture
    Vacuum tube
    Biospecimen Acquisition Needle gauge 21 gauge
    22 gauge
    23 gauge
    Biospecimen Acquisition Cannulation 14 gauge catheter
    16 gauge catheter
    18 gauge catheter
    20 gauge catheter
    Biospecimen Aliquots and Components Aliquot sequential collection 1st collection
    Not first collection
    Biospecimen Acquisition Type of collection container/solution 5 mL syringe
    10 mL syringe
    20 mL or higher syringe

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • New SOPs Available

  • More...