NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Analysis of quality metrics in comprehensive cancer genomic profiling using a dual DNA-RNA panel.

Author(s): Watanabe K, Kohsaka S, Tatsuno K, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Isago H, Kage H, Ushiku T, Aburatani H, Mano H, Oda K

Publication: Pract Lab Med, 2024, Vol. 39, Page e00368

PubMed ID: 38404525 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

This paper compared two DNA integrity markers (Q-value and ddCq) and one RNA integrity metric (DV200) using DNA and RNA extracted from 585 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks that had been stored for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-5 y or approximately 5 years before extraction. The authors investigated the predictive performance of these metrics for four next-generation sequencing quality metrics. Potential effects associated with the hospital of collection/processing and cancer type on the DNA/RNA quality metrics evaluated were also examined.

Conclusion of Paper

The duration of FFPE block storage had a deleterious effect on DNA and RNA integrity, with a higher ratio of short to long real-time PCR products (ddCq), a lower ratio of PCR-amplified DNA to double-stranded DNA (Q-value), and a lower percentage of RNA fragments >200 bp (DV200) noted with progressive storage. While ddCq was weakly to modestly negatively correlated with the percentage on-target reads, and mean and target exon coverage, Q-value was weakly to modestly positively correlated with the percentage of on-target reads and coverage uniformity and DV200 were weakly positively correlated with coverage of housekeeping genes. A ddCq ≤5.36 was highly predictive of a mean depth >500 but less predictive of coverage uniformity or target exon coverage. A Q-value ≥0.928 was predictive of a mean depth >500, coverage uniformity ≥99%, and target exon coverage ≥99%. The predictive power of a DV200 >41 for coverage of housekeeping genes that was ≥70% was 92.1%. ddCq and Q-values displayed significant differences among hospitals even after correcting for tumor type, but DV200 was not affected by hospital. Q-values were lowest and DV200 highest in lung tumors.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    This study compared two DNA integrity markers (Q-value and ddCq) and one RNA integrity metric (DV200) using DNA and RNA extracted from 585 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks that had been stored for <1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-5 y or approximately 5 years before extraction. The authors investigated the predictive performance of these metrics for four next-generation sequencing quality metrics. Potential effects associated with the hospital of collection/processing and cancer type on the DNA/RNA quality metrics were also examined. A total of 585 tissues that included 114 lung, 90 bowel, 58 ovarian/fallopian tube, 51 uterus, 38 soft tissue, 31 cervix, and 203 specimens of types representing <5% of the total were collected (further details were not provided) and fixed in 10-20% neutral buffered formalin for 24-72 h before paraffin embedding. The specimens were contributed from multiple hospitals, with six hospitals providing >10 specimens. DNA (582 specimens) and RNA (572 specimens) were extracted using the GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit and the RNeasy FFPE Kit, respectively. Double stranded DNA was quantified by Qubit and amplifiable DNA was quantified using the TaqMan Copy Number Reference Assay Human RNase P.  The Q value was then calculated as the percentage of dsDNA that was amplifiable.  NA quantity was defined as the amount of double-stranded DNA when the Q-value was >1 and as the amount of amplifiable DNA when the Q-Value was ≥1. The ddCq value was calculated based on the ratio of two real-time PCR amplicons in the FFPE DNA QC Assay version 2 Kit. The percentage of RNA fragments >200 bp (DV200) was assessed using a 2200 TapeStation. DNA and the RNA libraries were prepared using a SureSelectXT Custom Kit and the SureSelect RNA Capture Kit, respectively, and sequenced on a Next-seq Instrument.

    Summary of Findings:

    The duration of FFPE block storage had a deleterious effect on DNA integrity, with significantly higher ddCq values and lower Q-values noted with progressive storage. ddCq values were higher in specimens stored for >1 year compared to those stored for approximately 1 year (P<0.001, all), stored >3 years compared to 1-2 years (P<0.001, both), or stored approximately 5 years compared to those stored 2-3 or 3-5 years (P<0.001, both). Q-values were lower in specimens that were stored for 5 years than 3-5 years (P<0.01), 2-3 years (P<0.001), 1-2 years (P<0.001), or approximately 1 year (P<0.001), or stored for 3-5 years compared to those stored 1-2 years (P<0.01) or approximately 1 year (P<0.01) but were not significantly different in specimens stored <3 years when compared to those stored for approximately 1 year. ddCq was negatively correlated with the percentage on-target reads (r=-0.47, P<0.001), mean depth (r=-0664, P<0.001), and target exon coverage (r=-0.362, P<0.001); Q-value was correlated with the percentage on-target reads (r=0.353, P<0.001) and coverage uniformity (r=0.411, P<0.001). In a generalized linear model, the percentage of on-target reads was associated with ddCq, but mean depth was associated with ddCq and Q-value. The predictive power of a ddCq ≤5.36 for a mean depth >500 was 91.6%, but the same cut-off was less predictive of coverage uniformity ≥99% (55.1%) or target exon coverage ≥99% (60.6%).  The predictive power of a Q-value ≥0.928 for a mean depth >500, coverage uniformity ≥99%, and target exon coverage ≥99% was 79.9%, 81.5%, and 83.1% respectively.  For specimens with a low ddCq (≤5.36) but unacceptable Q-values, the on-target read percentage and mean depth were still generally acceptable but uniformity and target exon coverage were <99%. ddCq and Q-values displayed significant differences among hospitals even after correcting for tumor type. Q-values were lowest in lung tumors.

     Similarly, DNA and RNA integrity were adversely affected by block storage. The percentage of RNA fragments >200 nt (DV200) decreased progressively with FFPE block storage duration, with significantly lower DV200 values from specimens that were stored >2 years than those stored approximately 1 year (P<0.001 all) or those stored for 3-5 years or approximately 5 years compared to those stored approximately 1 year (P<0.01, both). DV200 was weakly positively correlated with the coverage of housekeeping genes (r=0.369, P<0.001).  The predictive power of a DV200 >41 for a coverage of housekeeping genes ≥70% was 92.1%. DV200 was not significantly different among hospitals but was significantly higher in lung cancer specimens than in bowel or ovarian/fallopian cancer specimens.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    • Not specified
    • Neoplastic - Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Fluorometry
    DNA Real-time qPCR
    RNA Next generation sequencing
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    DNA Next generation sequencing
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Acquisition Biospecimen location Lung
    Bowel
    Ovarian
    Uterus
    Cervix
    Soft tissue
    Other
    Biospecimen Acquisition Locale of biospecimen collection Different hospitals compared
    Storage Storage duration Approximately 1 year
    1-2 years
    2-3 years
    3-5 years
    Approximately 5 years
    Real-time qPCR Specific Technology platform ddCq
    Q-value

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Just Published!

  • April 24, 2024: Biobanking for Precision Medicine Seminar

  • Most Popular SOPs in March 2024

  • More...