NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

DNA qualification workflow for next generation sequencing of histopathological samples.

Author(s): Simbolo M, Gottardi M, Corbo V, Fassan M, Mafficini A, Malpeli G, Lawlor RT, Scarpa A

Publication: PLoS One, 2013, Vol. 8, Page e62692

PubMed ID: 23762227 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of quantification method, RNA interference, and DNA integrity on the quantification of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and frozen specimens.

Conclusion of Paper

DNA concentration is overestimated by NanoDrop due to interference of RNA and quantification of severely degraded DNA. This overestimation is particularly problematic for FFPE specimens compared to frozen ones and prevented the construction of a next-generation sequencing library from FFPE specimens.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of quantification method, RNA interference, and DNA integrity on the quantification of DNA from FFPE and frozen specimens. DNA was extracted from 6 frozen tissues (five pancreas and one spleen) stored at -80°C using QIAmp AllPrep DNA/RNA mini kit and from 6 FFPE tissues (four pancreas, one duodenum and one liver) using the QIAmp DNA FFPE tissue kit.

    Summary of Findings:

    With the exception of one frozen specimen, measured levels of DNA were higher when quantified using NanoDrop then when quantified using Qubit. Electrophoresis and real-time PCR showed the DNA was intact, and QuBit quantification was accurate, but that NanoDrop overestimated the DNA concentration. Further, dilution of the DNA did not increase the accuracy of quantification. For high molecular weight DNA, the performance of Qubit and NanoDrop were comparable, but when the DNA was degraded, such as in the FFPE specimens, Qubit performed better. When RNA was added to DNA, it interfered with determination of DNA concentration by NanoDrop, but Qubit was only affected when the sample had 4-fold more RNA than DNA. Importantly, when NanoDrop was used to quantify DNA for construction of a next-generation sequencing library from FFPE specimens, no amplification was observed, but when DNA was quantified using Qubit, the library was adequate for sequencing in 2 of 3 specimens with the single failure due to organic contamination.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    • Frozen
    Diagnoses:
    • Not specified
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    DNA Electrophoresis
    DNA Real-time qPCR
    DNA Spectrophotometry
    DNA Fluorometry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Biospecimen Preservation Type of fixation/preservation Formalin (buffered)
    Snap frozen
    Spectrophotometry Specific Technology platform Qubit
    NanoDrop
    Electrophoresis
    Real-time PCR
    Spectrophotometry Specific Template/input amount Diluted with RNA
    Diluted 1:1
    Diluted 1:5
    Diluted 1:10

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...