NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (DCTD) NIH - National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute DCTD - Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis

Expression analysis on archival material: comparison of 5 commercially available RNA isolation kits for FFPE material.

Author(s): Boeckx C, Wouters A, Pauwels B, Deschoolmeester V, Specenier P, Lukaszuk K, Vermorken JB, Pauwels P, Peeters M, Lardon F, Baay MF

Publication: Diagn Mol Pathol, 2011, Vol. 20, Page 203-11

PubMed ID: 22089347 PubMed Review Paper? No

Purpose of Paper

The purpose of this paper was to determine the effects of the type of RNA extraction kit used on RNA yield, quality and amplificability from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cervical cancer specimens.

Conclusion of Paper

The largest RNA yield and highest purity, as determined by spectrophotometer, was obtained using RNeasy FFPE Isolation kit. RNA extracted using the RecoverAll kit had a slightly higher average RNA integrity number (RIN) than that extracted with the Nucleospin, RNeasy or ArrayGrade FFPE kits. The average cycle threshold (CT) values for amplification of TATA-binding protein (TBP) were similar between RNA extracted with the three different kits, but CT values were over 31 for 20 of the 22 specimens. There were no obvious effects of storage duration on RNA yield.

Studies

  1. Study Purpose

    The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of RNA extraction kit on yield, quality and amplificability from FFPE cervical cancer specimens. FFPE sections had been stored at room temperature for 11.8-13.1 years. RNA was extracted from three 10 uM sections for each of 10-12 specimens. Specimens were deparaffinized with xylene prior to extraction, with the exception of the specimens extracted with QuickExtract which were heated instead.

    Summary of Findings:

    The largest RNA yield and highest purity, as determined by spectrophotometer, was obtained using the RNeasy FFPE Isolation kit followed by the RecoverAll and the ArrayGrade FFPE kits, which had similar yields. The NucleoSpin kit produced low yields, and the authors report that RNA extracted using QuickExtract was contaminated with paraffin. Consequently, RNA extracted with NucleoSpin and QuickExtract were excluded from further analysis. RNA extracted using the RecoverAll kit had a slightly higher average RIN than that extracted with the NucleoSpin, RNeasy or ArrayGrade kits (2.47 versus 2.28, 2.18, and 2.09, respectively). 11 of 12 specimens extracted using RNeasy had sufficient RNA yields for real-time RT-PCR, but only 6 of 12 specimens extracted using RecoverAll and 5 of 12 specimens extracted using ArrayGrade had sufficient yields for real-time RT-PCR analysis. The average CT values for amplification of TBP were similar between RNA extracted with the three different kits, but CT values were over 31 for 20 of the 22 extracts. There were no obvious effects of storage duration on RNA yield.

    Biospecimens
    Preservative Types
    • Formalin
    Diagnoses:
    • Neoplastic - Carcinoma
    Platform:
    AnalyteTechnology Platform
    RNA Automated electrophoresis/Bioanalyzer
    RNA Real-time qRT-PCR
    RNA Spectrophotometry
    Pre-analytical Factors:
    ClassificationPre-analytical FactorValue(s)
    Storage Storage duration 11.8-13.1 years
    Real-time qRT-PCR Specific Targeted nucleic acid TBP
    Analyte Extraction and Purification Analyte isolation method RNeasy FFPE isolation kit
    RecoverAll Total nucleic acid isolation kit
    ArrayGrade FFPE RNA isolation kit
    NucleoSpin FFPE RNA isolation kit
    QuickExtract FFPE RNA extraction kit

You Recently Viewed  

News and Announcements

  • Most Downloaded SOPs in 2024

  • New Articles on the GTEx Project are Now FREELY Available!

  • Just Published!

  • More...